Why Top Leadership Firms Are Measuring Curiosity In The AI Era

Why Top Leadership Firms Are Measuring Curiosity In The AI Era

getty

Years ago, I interviewed elder leaders from 2 firms that compete for galore of the aforesaid clients. Kevin Cashman, past a elder partner astatine Korn Ferry and now its Vice Chairman of CEO and Enterprise Leadership, told maine the astir innovative leaders he had studied kept asking questions moreover aft they believed they already had the answer, conscionable to spot if thing mightiness still alteration their view. Greg Welch, who launched Spencer Stuart’s Marketing Officer Practice and astir precocious led its Marketing, Sales & Communications Practice successful North America, described the strongest CMOs he recruited arsenic bright, curiosity-driven executives group wanted to follow. Neither speech was astir AI, but some anticipated a value these firms now link straight to activity imaginable and readiness for the AI era.

Why This Focus On Curiosity Matters To You, Not Just The Industry

Curiosity has go communal connection successful a batch of activity bios lately, truthful it would beryllium easy to publication this arsenic different inclination portion and move on. Here is why I'd inquire you to slow down instead. Several competing firms, the ones companies prosecute to thief place and create their early leaders, person built curiosity into really they measure activity imaginable and AI readiness. That should matter to you, whether aliases not you'll ever beryllium crossed from 1 of these firms, because the differences betwixt their definitions uncover wherever your ain curiosity whitethorn beryllium helping aliases limiting you.

Korn Ferry Built Curiosity Into Its AI Readiness Model

Korn Ferry has developed what it calls the AI-Ready Leader Success Profile, designed to place which leaders are genuinely prepared to guideline their organizations done AI adoption. Among the traits it explicitly measures is simply a class the patient describes arsenic future-focused thinking, leaders who enactment curious, research what is possible, and thief their teams spot really AI tin unlock caller potential. Korn Ferry recovered that astir each leader expects AI to disrupt their industry, yet only 11% of talent leaders judge their activity teams are good prepared for it. What Cashman told maine years agone helps explicate why that spread tin persist. Leaders whitethorn research AI agelong capable to shape an opinion, past extremity asking whether caller grounds should alteration it. Ask yourself wherever your ain AI opinions came from and erstwhile you past updated them, since the reply says much astir your readiness than the sentiment itself.

Russell Reynolds And Egon Zehnder Measure Curiosity Too

Russell Reynolds Associates built a parallel model called AI Quotient, which measures a leader's AI readiness, curiosity, and adaptability together arsenic a azygous package, treating curiosity arsenic a halfway portion of AI readiness alternatively than a secondary activity trait. Egon Zehnder arrived astatine this territory good complete a decade earlier. Its Potential model, first published successful Harvard Business Review, has agelong named curiosity arsenic 1 of only 4 traits predicting whether a leader keeps increasing into bigger roles, and the patient continues building connected that reasoning done dedicated activity connected what it calls the telephone for curiosity successful leadership. Between the two, location is simply a useful lesson: curiosity has constricted worth unless it changes really you respond erstwhile caller accusation challenges your existing approach.

Heidrick & Struggles Quantifies Curiosity Directly

Heidrick & Struggles includes curiosity arsenic 1 of 4 named predictors successful its Agile Leader Potential assessment, defined specifically arsenic a person's inclination to activity caller experiences, learning opportunities, and replacement ways of thinking. This model scores curiosity directly, giving the patient a specific measure of whether a leader tin accommodate quickly capable to support gait pinch a changing role. That meaning is useful because you tin activity caller experiences while remaining closed to caller ways of thinking, and the 2 are not the aforesaid skill.

Spencer Stuart's Curiosity Research Points To The Risk Of Past Playbooks

Spencer Stuart's publication comes from a different angle, and it happens to beryllium adjacent to what I've spent overmuch of my ain profession studying. In a multi-year study of S&P 500 CEOs, the firm's ain researchers recovered that leaders who ran much than 1 institution typically performed amended successful their first domiciled than their second. The patient warned that acquainted playbooks and established intelligence models tin limit a leader's willingness to support learning. When Spencer Stuart asked its highest-performing repetition CEOs what separated their stronger stretches from their weaker ones, the reply came backmost consistently arsenic insatiable curiosity and a desire for learning. One CEO successful their investigation described trading a playbook afloat of actions for 1 afloat of questions, echoing almost precisely really Welch erstwhile described the CMOs he astir wanted to place. If you person already succeeded once, this whitethorn beryllium the astir useful informing successful the article: the playbook that helped create your first occurrence tin limit the adjacent 1 erstwhile you extremity questioning it.

What Their Public Curiosity Models Do Not Yet Explain

Several of the astir influential firms successful activity advisory, moving independently and utilizing different language, person converged connected a akin conclusion. Curiosity is becoming a capacity these firms link pinch activity potential, agility, AI readiness, and sustained performance, alternatively than a value they simply praise.

The harder mobility near opinionated is why curiosity varies truthful overmuch betwixt 2 leaders who look identical connected paper, aliases why you could beryllium funny capable to triumph a domiciled the first clip and suffer that small heart by the second. My ain peer-reviewed research, published successful Heliyon, developed and validated a instrumentality that measures 4 factors that tin inhibit curiosity successful moving adults: fear, assumptions, technology, and environment. That activity offers different measurement to understand why leaders who worth curiosity whitethorn still neglect to show it consistently. Established assumptions are 1 imaginable barrier, on pinch fear, exertion habits, and the surrounding environment. In a abstracted exploratory study of C-suite executives, respondents besides associated curiosity-driven initiatives pinch important financial savings, suggesting this capacity carries consequences beyond activity style. Naming curiosity arsenic valuable turns retired to beryllium the much straightforward half of the problem these firms person identified. The harder mobility for you is which of these 4 factors is shaping your behaviour earlier you presume the reply is simply to go much curious.

Why Top Leadership Firms Are Measuring Curiosity For The AI Era

These firms are giving curiosity a larger domiciled successful leadership appraisal because AI increases the consequence of relying connected fixed answers, acquainted intelligence models, and past experience. Their activity shows curiosity becoming a capacity organizations are consenting to place and, successful respective cases, people directly. The adjacent situation is knowing what suppresses curiosity successful different tin leaders and what tin reconstruct it. Before deciding that you request much curiosity, place what is blocking the curiosity you already have.