In an absorbing and favorable announcement of Changing Planes (which you tin find elsewhere connected the site, successful Spanish and English), the Argentinean reviewer asserts that since Le Guin isn’t a difficult subject fabrication writer, “technology is cautiously avoided.” I stuck a footnote onto this successful my translator of the article, and present is the footnote expanded — because this business is really getting my goat.
‘Hard’ SF is each astir technology, and ‘soft’ SF doesn’t person immoderate technology, right? And my books don’t person exertion successful them, because I americium only willing successful psychology and emotions and squashy worldly for illustration that, right?
Not right. How tin genuine subject fabrication of immoderate benignant deficiency technological content? Even if its main liking isn’t successful engineering aliases really machines activity — if for illustration astir of mine, it’s much willing successful really minds, societies, and cultures activity — still, really tin anybody make a communicative astir a early aliases an alien civilization without describing, implicitly aliases explicitly, its technology?
Nobody can. I can’t ideate why they’d want to.
Its exertion is really a nine copes pinch beingness reality: really group get and support and navigator food, really they clothe themselves, what their powerfulness sources are (animal? human? water? wind? electricity? other?) what they build pinch and what they build, their medicine — and truthful connected and on. Perhaps very ethereal group aren’t willing successful these mundane, bodily matters, but I’m fascinated by them, and I deliberation astir of my readers are too.
Technology is the progressive quality interface pinch the worldly world.
But the connection is consistently misused to mean only the enormously analyzable and specialised technologies of the past fewer decades, supported by monolithic exploitation some of earthy and quality resources.
This is not an acceptable usage of the word. “Technology” and “hi tech” are not synonymous, and a exertion that isn't “hi,” isn’t needfully '“low” successful immoderate meaningful sense.
We person been truthful desensitized by a 100 and 50 years of ceaselessly expanding method prowess that we deliberation thing little analyzable and showy than a machine aliases a pitchy bomber deserves to beryllium called “technology” astatine all. As if linen were the aforesaid point arsenic flax — arsenic if paper, ink, wheels, knives, clocks, chairs, aspirin pills, were earthy objects, calved pinch america for illustration our teeth and fingers — arsenic if alloy saucepans pinch copper bottoms and fleece vests spun from recycled solid grew connected trees, and we conscionable picked them erstwhile they were ripe...
One measurement to exemplify that astir technologies are, successful fact, beautiful “hi,” is to inquire yourself of immoderate manmade object, Do I cognize really to make one?
Anybody who ever lighted a occurrence without matches has astir apt gained immoderate due respect for “low” aliases “primitive” aliases “simple” technologies; anybody who ever lighted a occurrence with matches should person the wits to respect that notable hi-tech invention.
I don’t cognize really to build and powerfulness a refrigerator, aliases programme a computer, but I don’t cognize really to make a fishhook aliases a brace of shoes, either. I could learn. We each tin learn. That’s the neat point astir technologies. They’re what we tin study to do.
And each subject fabrication is, successful 1 measurement aliases another, technological. Even erstwhile it’s written by group who don’t cognize what the connection means.
All the same, I work together pinch my reviewer that I don’t constitute difficult subject fiction. Maybe I constitute easy subject fiction. Or possibly the difficult stuff’s inside, hidden — for illustration bones, arsenic opposed to an exoskeleton.…
— Ursula K. Le Guin, 2005
English (US) · 
Indonesian (ID) ·