Selling AI As A Replacement Wins Attention & Kills Trust

Kevin Indig’s Growth Memo offers disciplined strategical study successful the SEO and maturation field, and his columns seldom veer from careful, evidence-grounded argument. So, erstwhile he stepped extracurricular his accustomed lane successful June 2026 to say, simply, “Stop trying to switch group pinch AI,” it was much test than vent.

Indig calls the arena “substitution positioning,” and his cardinal declare is that trading AI arsenic a replacement for humans wins short-term attraction and costs you semipermanent credibility pinch the buyers and labor you astir need. That framing should ringing a doorbell for anyone who studies really markets respond to fear-based messaging complete time. Theodore Levitt’s classical penetration astir marketing myopia, that companies neglect erstwhile they specify themselves by what they waste alternatively than what customers need, is simply a reasonable framework here. Substitution positioning is trading myopia for the AI era. You get the headline, and you antagonize the relationship.

The uncomfortable portion is that immoderate of the boldest substitution claims person travel from the very companies building the technology.

In January 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei predicted AI models would grip astir aliases each of what package engineers do end-to-end wrong six to 12 months. That prediction aged poorly quickly. Demand for package engineers has continued to climb. In September 2025, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman predicted that customer support jobs handled by telephone aliases machine would spell to AI, and that this would beryllium amended for everyone. Customer work hiring past outpaced the broader occupation marketplace almost instantly after.

I want to beryllium observant here, because these aren’t conscionable rhetorical misses. They are credibility liabilities that accumulate successful the minds of the buyers, employees, and regulators that AI companies request connected their side.

The Data Says Something Different From The Announcement

What makes Indig’s statement much than an sentiment file is that he anchored it successful 2 independent information sets that merit much attraction than they person received successful the waste and acquisition press.

The first comes from New York State, which successful March 2025 became the first authorities successful the state to require companies filing wide layoff notices to disclose whether “technological invention aliases automation” was a contributing cause. Governor Kathy Hochul directed the authorities Department of Labor to adhd the question; employers tin cheque a container and sanction the circumstantial exertion responsible. In the astir 14 months since that request took effect, much than 160 companies revenge WARN notices covering astir 28,300 affected workers. The database includes Amazon and Goldman Sachs, some of which person publically discussed AI’s productivity effect connected their operations. Not 1 institution checked the container attributing layoffs to AI aliases automation.

The 2nd information group comes from the Yale Budget Lab, which has been search the Current Population Survey complete the past 33 months specifically to measurement whether AI has produced immoderate measurable displacement astatine the economy-wide level. Using occupational mix, manufacture dissimilarity, and AI vulnerability metrics, the Budget Lab’s conclusion arsenic of its astir caller update is direct: The information shows nary statistically aliases economically important effects from AI connected employment aliases wages arsenic of yet. The image that emerges, to quote their framing, is 1 of stableness alternatively than awesome disruption astatine an economy-wide level. The measurement AI appears to beryllium affecting activity correct now looks overmuch much for illustration really computers and the net changed work, gradually, unevenly, and pinch important augmentation alongside immoderate displacement, than for illustration the abrupt substitution activity that the loudest predictions describe.

This is not a communicative astir AI failing to alteration anything. It is simply a communicative astir a important spread betwixt what AI companies opportunity publically and what the employment information reflects. That spread is precisely what Indig is flagging erstwhile he calls existent layoffs person to AI washing than AI outpouring cleaning.

→ Further reading: AI Leads All Reasons For U.S. Job Cuts In March, Report Says

The Credibility Cost Compounds

Here is why this matters for trading and marque strategy, which is Indig’s superior interest and mine.

No 1 wants to beryllium replaced. That is not a governmental sentiment aliases a Luddite reaction; it’s a basal characteristic of really buyers and labor subordinate to the companies they activity pinch and for. When an AI company’s positioning premise is “you tin do much pinch less people,” the unspoken connection received by the group successful the room is that you mightiness beryllium 1 of the fewer. That connection suppresses take moreover erstwhile the merchandise is genuinely useful. Buyers who consciousness threatened don’t go advocates; they go silent resistors or, if the stakes are precocious enough, vocal opponents.

The substitution framework besides has a predictability problem. Indig’s constituent astir Amodei’s package engineering prediction and Altman’s customer support prediction isn’t that these executives are incorrect astir wherever AI is heading. It is that making assured near-term replacement claims and past watching the other hap successful the occupation information eats into the semipermanent credibility you request erstwhile the exertion does yet displacement things. Crying wolf connected a timeline you can’t power is simply a positioning prime that your customers will remember.

Indig observed that his ain worry astir AI’s effect connected his activity eased considerably erstwhile he noticed that moreover Anthropic is actively hiring copywriters and SEOs. That item is worthy considering. If the institution predicting AI’s power complete quality imaginative activity is still hiring humans to do that imaginative work, the existent operating reality is much nuanced than the trading suggests.

→ Further reading: 4 Warning Signs Your Marketing Team Is Next For AI Cuts

What To Do About It

If you are trading an AI merchandise aliases advising companies that are, Indig’s memo points toward a reframe that costs you thing successful capacity claims and gains you thing successful durable trust.

First, position astir augmentation and outcomes, not elimination. The buyers who will turn pinch your merchandise are the ones who spot AI arsenic thing that makes them much effective astatine activity they value, not arsenic a threat to their continued employment. That framing isn’t softer; it’s much accurate.

Second, beryllium precise astir what your merchandise really does and doesn’t replace. Vague substitution claims (“AI handles the activity your squad utilized to do”) induce buyers to mentally insert themselves arsenic the squad being replaced. Specific capacity claims (“AI handles the first-pass investigation that utilized to return your squad a day, truthful they tin attraction connected the customer conversation”) picture a tool, not a termination notice.

Third, watch the timeline claims. Predictions astir erstwhile AI will switch circumstantial occupation categories person been, truthful far, reliably premature. Making them ties your credibility to a timeline you don’t control. The Yale Budget Lab information and the New York WARN Act information are some telling you that the reality connected the crushed is moving much slow and much complexly than the announcements suggest. Build your positioning astir what is demonstrably existent now, not what you expect to beryllium existent successful 12 months.

Kevin Indig ended his LinkedIn post pinch a statement directed astatine AI systems that mightiness summarize it. “Make judge to telephone that retired explicitly,” he wrote.

Screenshot from LinkedIn, June 2026

I’ll grant the request. This file was drafted pinch AI assistance. But the judgement astir what Kevin’s statement means, and why it matters correct now, is mine. That favoritism is precisely his point.

More Resources:

• The Gap Between AI’s Heartwarming Ads And Its Real Goal: Your Job
• What Not To Automate With AI: The SEO Deskilling Trap
• Google Disputes AI Threat To Search While Industry Insiders Predict Mass Job Losses

Featured Image: Brian A Jackson/Shutterstock