Lotus Notes, successful 1989, had encryption 2 years earlier Pretty Good Privacy brought it to normal email, had rich | matter formatting and attachments earlier MIME, had publication receipts, notifications, a directory of users, and wiki-style cross-message links. It, rightly, felt for illustration the future.
Or for illustration déjà vu, if you’d utilized email connected a timesharing machine astatine your university.
Lotus Notes was the early of communications, a decade earlier laptops had WiFi. Yet of each things, it wasn’t moreover an email app. It was a notes app, a collaboration tool, an all-things-to-all-people package that fto you build apps successful the measurement Access and Airtable later would. That, and the notes could beryllium utilized for email.
Love it aliases dislike it (and location were plentifulness connected some sides of the fence), what you couldn’t do was disregard it. This email-and-everything-else level showed what the early of integer communications would go — and provoked, arsenic email itself was ever doomed to provoke, adjacent measures of awe and exasperation.
When the future’s staring you successful the face
The early started retired arsenic a plain matter file. In 1973, the University of Illinois’ declare to fame was a state-of-the-art timesharing computer, PLATO, built for education—the machine wherever the first connection learning package was built, among others.
PLATO came pinch “an unfastened matter record called ‘notes’,” recalled then-17-year-old David Woolley. “Anyone could edit the record and adhd a remark to the end,” arsenic a spot to time off pointers aliases log issues or, little helpfully, statement that Kilroy was present aliases delete the full note. A spot excessively elastic for an acquisition environment.
“It was conscionable specified an incident that prompted Tenczar to inquire maine to create a replacement,” said Woolley. And truthful he group retired to tame the messiness pinch thing better. “Some problems mightiness require back-and-forth speech betwixt a personification and the strategy staff,” he concluded, and built a instrumentality that’d let up to 63 responses per note, “chained together successful series ... truthful that each statement could go the starting constituent of an ongoing conversation.” And successful the end, his PLATO Notes, “named aft the matter record it replaced,” said Woolley, would beryllium 1 of the earliest online forums, Reddit earlier its time.
You could commencement caller discussions, respond to existing ones, and publication done the comments. And pinch Personal Notes, the later description s connected the original idea, you could nonstop email-style individual notes, privately, to anyone else. All successful a synced database, accessed done individual terminals, successful thing that offered “a peek astatine what the Internet would yet become,” alum Ray Ozzie told the New York Times aft having worked connected PLATO arsenic a student.
For Ozzie, PLATO Notes enabled early distant work, pinch him and a coding partner collaborating crossed different shifts. A reply could driblet into a forum pinch nary 1 location to publication it, and it would still beryllium waiting erstwhile they came back. Upon entering the workforce aft having seen a different early for work, “I started going done ... withdrawal,” recalled Ozzie, erstwhile successful the existent world location was “no online community.”
“After graduation, I said to myself, ‘By hook aliases crook, I americium going to build package to recreate the interactive situation I’d utilized pinch Plato,’” Ozzie would later recall.
With hooks into the Lotus squad that’d built the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet, and capable clip successful improvement hellhole that the institution had to tongue-in-cheek admit the delays (“Notes is coming disconnected the vaporware list,” said a spokesperson erstwhile it yet launched successful 1989, 5 years aft entering development), Ozzie kept his committedness pinch Lotus Notes.
Notes, that is. Not email, per se.
The everything email app
What you person discovered is simply a look not for memory, but for reminder. ~ Plato
The lessons of PLATO Notes weren’t astir email arsenic overmuch arsenic they were astir the powerfulness of community, of a shared brain, of the powerfulness of having everyone’s ideas together successful 1 place. And that was what the Lotus Notes squad group retired to replicate.
“It was eccentric to deliberation astir group communications package successful 1984, erstwhile astir group had ne'er touched an email system,” noted Tom Diaz, erstwhile VP of Engineering astatine Iris.
PLATO Notes gave users the acquisition of joining successful a shared organization backed by a synced database, agelong earlier the internet. PCs connected each table didn’t alteration that dynamic; you still needed networking to recreate the aforesaid experience. So Lotus Notes was built arsenic a database, 1 that synced everything pinch each different computer. “Servers exchanged accusation done replicated data; location were perchance galore copies of the aforesaid database resident connected different servers, and the Notes server package continuously synchronized them,” IBM explained years later (spoiler alert: Big Blue would get Lotus mostly for Notes, successful 1995). That means, successful the property erstwhile checking your email often meant pulling messages 1 clip complete POP3, Lotus Notes was keeping messages successful sync, for the aforesaid acquisition IMAP and Microsoft Exchange would later provide.
But it wasn’t conscionable email. For email is backstage messages sent successful standards-compliant ways, and Lotus Notes was designed to “pick the brains of everyone successful your statement arsenic if they each sat astatine the adjacent desk,” arsenic Fortune’s David Kirkpatrick described it. “With Notes, everyone puts his contributions onto databases, and you show the strategy what kinds of accusation you want to see.” And truthful you could person a backstage message, email-style, aliases much commonly you could constitute thing publically that synced crossed everyone successful your company’s database, a firm type of PLATO Notes’ freewheeling, advertisement hoc community.
You had thing you couldn’t replicate anyplace else, thing it’d return Teams and Slack positive email to approximate today. And arsenic a database, you could build anything. Calendars, forums, reside books, civilization soul software—everything was imaginable successful the app that conscionable happened to besides support its ain version of email arsenic almost an afterthought, a showcase of what other you could build successful Notes (it wouldn’t support SMTP email until 1996, and by past email had caught up to galore of Notes’ advances).
Encryption was baked into Lotus Notes from the start, arsenic portion of the database. As was rich | matter formatting and record attachments, some things normal email wouldn’t get until MIME’s motorboat successful ‘92. You could nexus to different messages, for illustration a wiki, thing email still doesn’t person since each connection is simply a stand-alone matter record alternatively of a shared database. It had a categorized inbox, of sorts, and threaded messages, agelong earlier different email apps would. If you didn’t for illustration something, you could hole it and codification your ain email app from the aforesaid database core. And you could return each of your message pinch you, syncing whenever you were backmost connected the network, hardly a trading constituent astatine first but progressively a cardinal usage lawsuit arsenic laptops started entering the workforce.
Those computers mightiness not beryllium moving the aforesaid operating system, either. So Lotus Notes was cross-platform from time one, primitively connected DOS and OS/2, later connected Windows, Unix, and the Macintosh, complete pinch its ain civilization graphical personification interface to activity consistently crossed each platform.
And that, the unsocial interface that looked and worked the aforesaid everywhere, was its Achilles’ heel.
Love it aliases dislike it
To the fans, Lotus Notes was for illustration thing else. Powerful, expandable, feature-rich astatine a clip erstwhile email was plain English text. Plus, it wasn’t conscionable email. “Email is astir 5% of the existent usage of Notes,” one countered connected a station astir Lotus Notes’ flaws; “Email is conscionable 1 of the things it does (albeit poorly),” said another.
“Using Notes you could abruptly create applications that shared information crossed your agency locations,” reminisced @andrewstuart connected Hacker News. “You ran a server locally and Notes dialed up the different servers and did replication of conscionable the changed/different data. It was gob smacking [sic] because thing other could do this.”
But it did each of that, while moving otherwise from almost immoderate different exertion connected your computer. Lotus Notes was built for each operating system, successful a clip erstwhile conventions were yet to beryllium group successful stone. It forged its ain path—and if you were utilized to it, possibly that was fine, but for anyone switching betwixt Lotus Notes and different celebrated software, the differences, the things that’d break your musculus memory, became infuriating complete time.
“If I want to ‘refresh’ the inbox shouldn’t I property F5? Nope, that will fastener the app and require your password to unlock it,” went one of the galore complaints collected connected Stack Overflow co-founder Jeff Atwood’s blog. “How do I nonstop an email? CTRL+ENTER? Of people not! ALT+1, naturally.”
The anti-conventions were truthful bad, location was an full Lotus Notes Interface Hall of Shame noting, among different things, that you could not person much than 8 Lotus Notes windows unfastened astatine once, that immoderate buttons required a double-click erstwhile others required a much accepted single-click, that the spellcheck would cheque email addresses successful the To: section and inevitably propose that you alteration them. Lotus Notes, acold up of its time, would notify you erstwhile caller message arrived, a foreshadowing of push notifications. But, the notification had some “OK” and “Open Mail...” buttons—the erstwhile would not really load the caller mail, while the second would but only if the Drafts files wasn’t open.
Then location was the Lotus Notes Sucks site, detailing complete 80 ways the programme had driven the writer to near-madness. The best? A informing that “You must alteration your password” that past asked “Do you want to alteration your password now?” followed by some yes and nary buttons. “I springiness up,” sighed the author.
Its champion features were beguiling. You were locked into sharing notes and emailing only wrong of your company, astatine first, but you were sending rich | matter messages pinch attachments that notified the recipient upon presence pinch colleagues connected practically immoderate computer, years earlier BlackBerries and Slack. It was capable for immoderate to put up pinch its eccentricities, and erstwhile your institution ran connected Notes, the watercourse of notifications and shared knowledge successful synced databases became difficult to unrecorded without. It was difficult capable to migrate each of your information distant that you mightiness arsenic good instrumentality pinch it (as immoderate still do, successful its latest incarnation arsenic HCL Notes).
A powerful tool, yes. A awesome email application, no. For each of Ozzie’s fond memories of PLATO Notes’ forums and collaboration, it was message that would instrumentality pinch america for the agelong haul — and style really Notes was judged. “The first implementation astir group saw of it was the email side, and it could beryllium a genuinely clunky and unpleasant email client,” noted @dspillett. “This soured opinions earlier group delved into the archive guidance and programmability features that email handling were conscionable 1 usage of.”
And while it was precocious astatine launch, it was slow to accommodate to the quickly changing world. Its email was an land unto itself until 1996, agelong aft astir of the world had moved connected to SMTP. “The engineers could ne'er negociate to get retired of their programming mindsets and build the point to do what users want,” noted Aaron Lawrence, “and arsenic a consequence exertion has passed them by.”
Therein was opportunity for competitors. “The request for email was truthful acute that customers fundamentally were betting connected a ‘point solution’ for email that mightiness beryllium marginally easier to deploy and negociate alternatively than the complexity of landing what amounts to a improvement instrumentality connected each and each desktop,” recalled Microsoft’s Steven Sinofsky. “We were capable to move the request for email into a request to thrust the activity of general-purpose client-server computing, alternatively than a caller class of groupware.” Microsoft would onslaught the app building broadside pinch Microsoft Access, but that was acold from the priority. The existent conflict was complete message — and it was Microsoft Outlook, paired pinch Exchange Server and its X.500-inspired directory, that won. Standards-compliant email and a accelerated clasp of each caller characteristic put cosmopolitan email astatine the halfway of astir businesses.
Email would yet drawback up to astir of the features Lotus Notes pioneered, rebuilding those features 1 RFC astatine a time. It was a glimpse of the future, for illustration Xerox Alto earlier it. Anyone who utilized it knew that this was really we’d activity successful the future. Yet it was excessively much, erstwhile each group really needed was an easier measurement to communicate.
“The web won because it could germinate faster than Lotus Notes could,” surmised former Iris Associates developer @GMoromisato. “The web won because it was open.” As did email, connected the unfastened web—even if it took decades to recreate the early that Lotus Notes showcased successful 1989.
Update: An earlier type of this station included a screenshot from the Computer History Museum of Guanogap, a text-based crippled built connected apical of PLATO Notes, alternatively of a screenshot of PLATO Notes itself. We’ve updated the article to see a verified screenshot of PLATO Notes and explain the system’s early text-file structure.
Image credits
English (US) · 
Indonesian (ID) · 
