arXiv, and the specialized community at large, are facing a watershed moment. Scholarly publishing is currently changing at a fast pace, and we are seeing a enormous transformation in how researchers communicate their results.
Before the advent of AI, there was an effortlessly discernible, applicable bounds to the charge at which autonomous submissions could be produced, and arXiv’s unpaid moderators would bounds submitters who were fine complete that threshold. With AI tools becoming additional advanced and accessible to authors, the “practical limit” of how many document can be submitted is now up for debate. As of October 1st, 2026, arXiv is instituting an updated charge limiting guideline throughout all submitters and categories as a stopgap during we decide what may be the new finest custom for authors employing additional and additional advanced AI tools, and to provision us period to enhance our moderation tools and procedures accordingly.
Open admission repositories throughout the commission are seeing a keen addition in the figure of submissions per author, per month. In September of 2016, arXiv received 9,869 submissions. In September of 2024, arXiv received 20,569 submissions. This September, arXiv received 40,363 submissions, which in rotate generated nearly 9,000 assistance tickets for arXiv personnel and moderators. In lone the former two years, submissions have doubled.
Advanced AI tools are assisting run these increases by making certain aspects of investigation faster and easier. arXiv guideline permits authors to employ AI as a tool in assistance of their research as lengthy as it is disclosed and the investigation meets arXiv’s standards of scholarly involvement and advances the site of research. However, many of the submissions that arXiv is now receiving do not fulfill these requirements. Our moderators are observing an addition in lean document of narrow scope, as fine as ‘salami’ papers, anywhere a sole activity is damaged up and submitted as a set of smaller papers. There is additionally a marked addition in dense, AI-written papers. AI tools are making it uncomplicated for authors to flood arXiv and another repositories alongside these low-value papers.
The bosom of arXiv’s procedure for detecting and rejecting low-quality document is our many unpaid moderators. We are so grateful that they donate their period and ability all day. However, a comparatively small proportion of authors are submitting a ample figure of low-quality document and consuming a disproportionate fraction of the moderators’ time. This is unfair to authors who continue to present norm document — their document can be delayed for days or weeks as a result.
Thomas Dietterich, Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Oregon State University and Chair of the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council
arXiv now limits submitters to up to two submissions per calendar month, alongside a bounds of three total energetic submissions at any stated time. This guideline update is being put into consequence to equitably allocate our unpaid moderators’ period throughout arXiv authors, and defend the arXiv corpus from a keen addition in inappropriate submissions.
Rate-limiting is an established arXiv policy, alongside limiting initially chiefly remaining to moderator discretion. arXiv has continually asked that authors prosecute our codes of behavior and our submission guidelines. Articles submitted to arXiv must be of original, novel, and important self-contained investigation that is applicable to arXiv categories. All submissions to arXiv must encounter prescribed scholarly standards and be of scholarly interest to the specialized community. This guideline update strives to fairly allocate the incredibly precious activity of our unpaid moderators who inspect that submissions encounter these standards, and we anticipation it volition additionally advance authors to curate and present lone their finest activity to arXiv.
Frequently Asked Questions
- If my document is rejected, does it figure towards my monthly total?
- Yes – this charge bounds is for submissions, not announced papers, since it is submissions that consume moderator time. If you present two document in a month, whether they are accepted or rejected, you volition have to delay until the next duration to present to arXiv again. We desire to advance authors to be mindful alongside their work, taking attention that they are submitting item significant of scholarly involvement that meets arXiv’s guidelines and standards.
- What if my submissions are in distinct topic areas?
- This charge bounds applies to all submissions, throughout all categories.
- What if the two of my submissions from one duration are motionless “on hold” in the next month?
- If your allotted submissions from a former duration are on clasp in the next month, they do not figure against your submission bounds for next month. However, they do figure as a part of your total “active submission” bounds of 3 total submissions.
- What if I have a backlog of activity that I need to submit, or I need to present a document for a conference?
- Since 2024, arXiv has had a bounds of 3 energetic submissions at any time, and this bounds remains in place. We ask authors who have a backlog of activity to submit, or who need to present a document at a particular period for a conference, to scheme their submissions carefully so that the monthly submission charge limits and energetic submission charge limits volition not negatively effect them.
- If I present a document on behalf of myself and my co-authors, does that power their submission rate?
- No. All arXiv charge bounds policies use lone to submitters. If you present a document alongside multiple co-authors, that lone counts towards your submission rate, not theirs. It is crucial for co-authors to coordinate their submissions accordingly.
- What if I present a paper, and afterward delete it before it is announced?
- While we ask that authors lone present activity that is complete, polished, and prepared to be shared alongside their peers, we comprehend that authors may acknowledge following submitting that they missed item crucial that needs to be corrected or updated. Submitters who delete their submitted document before it is announced, any the reason, volition not have that document figure toward their monthly submission or energetic submission charge limits.
Thank you to our specialized community for supporting us in this guideline update. We depend on you to assistance us keep arXiv open, fast, and free, and to assistance us create certain submissions to arXiv are scientifically rigorous, of involvement to the community, and in keeping alongside current scholarly standards.
As alongside all policies, we volition continue to detect the consequence of this update on authors, readers, and the arXiv corpus, and modify as needed. Our goal in guideline updates is to not lone defend arXiv’s corpus, but to enhance the arXiv cognition for everyone who makes arXiv imaginable – authors, readers, staff, and all our unpaid moderators.
