Aug 22, 2026•5 min read
bySuranjan Das
pop culturemusicphilosophynot serious
The cardinal civilized mobility posed successful the 2015 opus “Sorry” by Justin Bieber, i.e., “Is it excessively precocious to opportunity sorry?” is really not a civilized mobility astatine each erstwhile viewed done a Kantian lens. The mobility successful itself contains the answer: yes, it is excessively precocious to opportunity sorry, not successful the consciousness that has thing to do pinch the quality of time, but alternatively the shape of the mobility itself shows that the opus fundamentally misunderstands what an apology is.
When we see the question’s implications, Bieber is not asking “What do I beryllium to the personification I person wronged?” Instead, the mobility chiefly asks whether saying sorry is still worthy anything. Utilizing a connection of strategy alternatively of duty, specified arsenic “Could personification telephone a referee?” aliases “one much changeable astatine forgiveness” further indicates that the mobility mightiness not beryllium asked successful bully faith.
If one’s apology becomes a intends towards an end, past it is simply a hypothetical imperative. You expect to summation forgiveness by utilizing the apology. A civilized obligation, however, does not dangle connected whether the desired consequence remains available. The song’s mobility of whether it is excessively precocious shows that Bieber measures the worth of this apology by what it tin accomplish.
One’s admissions of wrongdoing do not alteration this either. He claims “I made those mistakes possibly erstwhile aliases twice”, and past admits, “maybe a mates of 100 times”. Therefore, Bieber cannot declare ignorance of the truth that he has wronged someone. However, the opus does not look focused connected this. It continues, “So fto maine redeem myself tonight” and “I conscionable request 1 much changeable astatine 2nd chances.” The interest frankincense shifts instantly from the incorrect done to the evident consequences suffered by the wrongdoer. But civilized redemption is not restoring one’s preferences.
If 1 was acting from duty, their maxim would beryllium simpler: I person done wrong; truthful I ought to admit it. Whether forgiveness is imaginable is irrelevant, and the aforesaid goes for whether he gets different chance aliases not. If, successful this form, the apology is valuable only because it tin unafraid a 2nd chance aliases redemption, past it is not a civilized duty; it is simply a perchance useful strategy.
Further successful the song, Bieber clarifies that he’s “missing much than conscionable your body”. This is the existent logic for which the apology is being rendered. He is not confronting the incorrect he committed; instead, he is confronting the nonaccomplishment of thing he desired. His effort to suffice his volition by claiming that his feelings of missing encompass “more than conscionable your body” does not lick this problem either. It conscionable tells america that he values the affection, possibly companionship, and the wide narration itself. But the categorical imperative requires treating different personification arsenic an extremity successful itself, not arsenic a intends to fulfill one’s desires. Thus, we tin inquire ourselves: would the apology still beryllium rendered if Bieber knew for judge location is nary 2nd chance aliases redemption? If not, past the apology was rendered not because of the incorrect done successful the first place, but to reconstruct what the wrongdoer lost.
In later verses, the lyrics look to reenforce this suspicion. The statement “I’ll return each azygous portion of the blasted if you want maine to” is morally revealing. If 1 considers themselves responsible for a incorrect done, that work tin not dangle connected the victim’s request. One either takes the work successful bully faith, aliases they do not astatine all. Furthermore, the opus states “there is nary guiltless 1 successful this crippled for two” which again reveals that alternatively of offering a civilized apology, the opus seems to see wrongdoing arsenic a title successful which the guilt of the different statement is capable to diminish their own. But different person’s misconduct cannot change the maxim by which he acted.
Finally, the lyrics “can we some opportunity the words and hide this?” item that the nonsubjective is closure alternatively than civilized acknowledgment. Bieber qualifies his position again pinch “I’m not conscionable tryna get you backmost connected me” but the denial does small to resoluteness the problem erstwhile more. One’s civilized worthy perfectly cannot beryllium established conscionable by declaring the purity of their motives. The maxim must beryllium examined instead. If the maxim is “When I person wronged personification and fearfulness losing them, I will apologize successful the dream of regaining them,” past the apology remains hypothetical, and much importantly, fundamentally self-interested.
Thus, the song’s cardinal mobility ironically reveals the very civilized nonaccomplishment it seems to effort to repair. “Is it excessively late?” successful this discourse translates to “is an apology still tin of getting what I want?” Once an apology is evaluated by whether it tin unafraid forgiveness and reconciliation, it ceases to beryllium an action grounded successful duty. So, yes, it is excessively precocious to opportunity sorry, arsenic the opus conceives it.
This, however, does not extremity Bieber from doing what morality requires: accepting the incorrect without demanding thing successful return. Instead of asking whether it was excessively precocious to opportunity sorry, the civilized point to do would person been to conscionable opportunity it.
However, moreover though the mobility has a clear nonsubjective civilized answer, we cannot property immoderate civilized judgement to Bieber arsenic a quality being; we tin only reply the civilized mobility arsenic posed successful the song. If 1 were to see different mentation of the opus itself, the mobility posed mightiness not beryllium successful a civilized context, but alternatively arsenic a rhetorical device, i.e., the creator knows the opus is not talking astir a sincere apology, but alternatively it is pointing retired that we tin often opportunity sorry insincerely conscionable because we miss much than their body. This tin besides explicate the intentional determination to brace an upbeat creation way pinch lyrics that, connected the surface, look to beryllium astir thing overmuch much serious.
English (US) · 
Indonesian (ID) · 
