Why does Apple keep banning Telegram, but never X?

Aug 07, 2026 06:00 PM - 3 weeks ago 317

For astir an hr this week, Telegram vanished from Apple’s App Store. Even during that blip, it was a stunning absence for specified a awesome app: an avenue of connection for much than 1 cardinal users astir the world, utilized wide arsenic a unafraid level for people who unrecorded successful countries nether censorship. Apple later revealed that it had removed the app owed to the beingness of kid intersexual maltreatment worldly (CSAM) and restored it erstwhile that contented was removed.

But the determination erstwhile again stirred up questions and disorder astir Apple’s moderation policies and really it treats different companies. And 1 institution successful peculiar sprang to many people’s minds: X, the Elon Musk-owned level that stayed connected the App Store moreover arsenic sexualized Grok-generated images of children flooded the platform. What led to Telegram’s removal but X’s expertise to enactment online?

The reply whitethorn beryllium much governmental than technical. “When you are enforcing your contented moderation argumentation against an full platform, you are subjecting yourself to the blowback that will happen,” Anupam Chander, a professor of rule and exertion astatine Georgetown, tells The Verge.

Both Telegram and X person had their adjacent stock of controversies. Telegram, which is headquartered successful Dubai, garnered a estimation for having a laid-back approach to contented moderation.

“Removing X would person apt caused a firestorm of governmental consequence against Apple.”

In caller years, section governments person begun pressuring the app to delete contented and enforce caller restrictions. In 2017, for example, Telegram began removing “terrorist-related content” aft receiving threats from Indonesia, while Germany considered banning Telegram successful 2022 complete claims it facilitated dislike speech. Things came to a caput successful 2024, erstwhile French authorities arrested Pavel Durov, the Russian-born CEO and laminitis of Telegram, accusing him of “complicity” successful forbidden actions related to forbidden transactions and CSAM. (As of past year, France’s enquiry into Durov remains open.) Last month, Russia charged Durov pinch facilitating terrorism. The Russian authorities alleges Durov allows Ukrainian spies to usage Telegram to scheme attacks connected the country, to which Durov responded with a picture of himself flipping disconnected the camera.

Telegram has since taken a harder look astatine its contented moderation policies, changing its stance on backstage connection moderation, discontinuing some “misused” features, including 1 that allowed users to find and connection others nearby, and by complying pinch court orders asking for accusation connected users suspected of criminal activity. The messaging app has besides ramped up its detection of forbidden material.

That’s each to opportunity that, while ample and important, Telegram is besides seen arsenic a nuisance politically and a problematic level successful its ain right. “X has a acold stronger guidelines of governmental support successful the United States than Telegram does,” Chander said. That intends “removing X would person apt caused a firestorm of governmental consequence against Apple” to a grade it wouldn’t person for taking down Telegram. It was not a first for Apple, either; the institution previously removed Telegram owed to a CSAM usurpation successful 2018, for a likewise little play of time.

One lawsuit of forbidden contented tin beryllium capable to get an app removed from app stores, but Apple appears to person taken a very different attack erstwhile it came to X’s latest controversy. Late past year, X rolled retired an update giving users the expertise to edit images connected the level utilizing X’s Grok AI chatbot. Soon after, AI-generated deepfakes that undressed adults and children began spreading crossed the platform.

The consequence to the incident was large and reverberated crossed the globe; the UK’s erstwhile premier curate condemned X and advanced a deepfake law, while the European Union opened an investigation into the platform. Advocacy groups also called for the removal of X from Apple and Google’s app stores, but that ne'er happened. It sparked ineligible battles arsenic well, pinch Ashley St. Clair, the mother of 1 of Musk’s children, suing X for allowing Grok to make nonconsensual, sexualized images of her. A group of teens besides sued xAI — the Musk-owned institution successful complaint of Grok — complete accusations that its chatbot generated sexualized images of themselves arsenic minors.

Despite each of the unit connected Apple, the institution kept X successful its store. Instead, it began communicating pinch X down the scenes to petition changes.

Apple reached retired to the teams down the X and Grok apps “after it received complaints and saw news sum of the scandal,” according to a missive Apple wrote to US senators seen by NBC News. Apple asked the developers to “create a scheme to amended contented moderation,” NBC News reports. While Apple later recovered that X “substantially resolved its violations,” Apple reportedly told Grok’s squad that they needed to make further changes “or the app could beryllium removed from the App Store.”

Musk issued a connection successful January, saying: “Anyone utilizing Grok to make forbidden contented will suffer the aforesaid consequences arsenic if they upload forbidden content.” xAI later sued a man for allegedly utilizing Grok to make and administer CSAM. During this period, Apple removed neither X nor Grok and ne'er has, moreover though the AI chatbot wrong some apps generated undressed images of minors.

”Removing X would person had to beryllium a determination made astatine the very top, a determination that you’re consenting to suffer the governmental consequences, including a very irate Elon Musk,” Chander said. Apple is surely alert of what tin happen. In 2022, soon aft he bought Twitter, Musk began publicly complaining that Apple was trying to restrict the app; the conflict ended pinch Tim Cook giving Musk a circuit of Apple’s campus and resolving the evident “misunderstanding.”

Meanwhile, Durov claims that Apple removed Telegram earlier ever contacting the company. Apple declined to remark connected the moderation differences betwixt the 2 apps.

Apple intimately guards the process down its moderation decisions, truthful it’s difficult to show precisely really the institution useful pinch developers down closed doors. But Apple’s caller actions propose the rules person immoderate elasticity — astatine slightest erstwhile the world’s first trillionaire is involved.

Follow topics and authors from this communicative to spot much for illustration this successful your personalized homepage provender and to person email updates.

More