Every infrastructure assemblage successful modern history developed utilizing the aforesaid playbook. Someone builds earthy capacity up of demand. The earthy assets commoditizes and gets cheaper forever. And the money moves to whoever sells guaranteed, contracted work connected apical of it. So far, unreality ran it, telecom ran it, moreover spot makers did it to an extent. Crypto infrastructure is attempting to repetition it correct now.
Motivation to proceed this investigation came from a news article a mates of weeks ago. Storj, 1 of the really moving work businesses successful decentralized storage, went into Chapter 11 Bankruptcy successful July while its ain restructuring announcement called the business underneath “strong and right-sized,” held backmost by “legacy obligations from an earlier chapter,” and said it expects to support operating without interruption [1]. A crypto institution restructuring for illustration a normal business, to support serving customers for illustration a normal business. And that is not a azygous case. At slightest 3 different companies from the bequest DePIN abstraction were doing immoderate shape of restructuring, trading aliases splitting the business to get decoupled from the token constituent conscionable this summertime [1].
That’s what I want to talk astir successful Part 2 of a series. Part 1 based on the aged DePIN exemplary is dead. DePIN thesis was successful building Networks that incentivise mean group to crowdsource hardware, bandwidth, and storage, trying to move resources nary of america tin discuss pinch individually into services personification will really buy. Part 2 is the grounds of the OG exemplary stopping to work. The pattern, the winners, and wherever we are connected the curve.
I. The Pattern
The unreality ran the script
Amazon launched EC2 successful 2006, trading earthy compute by the hour. Rent a server, configure it yourself. Table 1 shows the infrastructure furniture financials for the past 12 years. The elephant successful the room is the truth that AWS is 18% of Amazon’s gross but 57% of its operating income, and Amazon is astir to rebuild the infrastructure furniture each complete again pinch astir $200B of CapEx successful 2026, driven by AI [2][3].
Table 1. AWS by year: the infrastructure furniture compounding.
| 2013 | $3.1B | n/a | n/a |
| 2015 | $7.9B | $1.9B | ~84% |
| 2017 | $17.5B | $4.3B | >100% (international losses exceeded North America unit profit) |
| 2019 | $35.0B | $9.2B | 63% |
| 2021 | $62.2B | $18.5B | 74% |
| 2023 | $90.8B | $24.6B | 67% |
| 2024 | $107.6B | $39.8B | 58% |
| 2025 | $128.7B | $45.6B | 57% |
Source: Amazon 10-K conception reporting, 2013-2025 [2][3]
The services built connected apical are the ones getting the worth accumulated from the infrastructure, not the infrastructure companies themselves. Netflix pays Amazon an estimated $1B+ a twelvemonth for efficaciously each its computing, astir 2 to 3 cents of each dollar Netflix earns (an estimate; Netflix delivers video complete its ain CDN, AWS runs the compute and storage) [4][5]. Snowflake books $4.5B successful merchandise gross and owns zero information centers. Datadog $3.4B, Zoom $4.9B, Airbnb $12.2B, each moving connected rented infrastructure their customers ne'er spot [6][7]. The full marketplace is renting earthy servers by the hr (Infrastructure arsenic a Service aliases IaaS) against vanished package delivered complete the net (Software arsenic a Service aliases SaaS). Total nationalist unreality spending deed $595.7B successful 2024, is forecast astatine $723.4B for 2025, and passes $1 trillion successful 2027 connected Gartner’s projection [8].
Diagram 1. The work furniture and its foundation: worldwide IaaS vs SaaS spending, $B. IaaS is Gartner's vendor-revenue actuals bid done 2024; SaaS is end-user spending, pinch the 2025 forecast dashed. Different Gartner methodologies, truthful comparison shapes, not nonstop levels [8].The work furniture is structurally larger and the absolute spread keeps widening, but the infrastructure furniture is presently the faster-growing one. GPUs and powerfulness are scarce again, truthful profits are flowing down to the infrastructure. Likely, if we were capable to isolate the GPU request growth, we would spot wide unreality commoditisation moreover further. Also, if the inclination continues, GPUs and powerfulness will beryllium an illustration of the aforesaid commoditisation successful a mates of years.
Telecom runs the aforesaid script, conscionable different wires
T-Mobile paid up to $1.35 cardinal for the genitor institution of Mint Mobile, a telephone marque that owns nary towers, nary spectrum, nary radios, but pinch Ryan Reynolds [9]. Over 2,100 specified carriers run successful astir 100 countries, an $89-99B world marketplace of telephone companies that rent everything (the manufacture calls them MVNOs) [10].
Table 2. Towers vs wireless services, US, 2010-2024.
| 2010 | $4.5B | $159.9B | $47.53 | 36x |
| 2015 | $10.1B | $191.9B | $44.65 | 19x |
| 2020 | $16.0B | $189.9B | $35.31 | 12x |
| 2024 | $19.4B | $224.9B | $33.36 | 12x |
Sources: institution yearly reports [11][12][13]; CTIA Annual Wireless Industry Survey [14]. Tower revenues see world operations, CTIA is US-only; dainty the ratio arsenic illustrative. Crown Castle 2024 arsenic reported; $4.46B continuing operations aft the 2025 fibre divestiture [12].
The aforesaid communicative arsenic successful unreality infrastructure, but pinch a twist. Raw resources get commoditised. The value per personification fell 30% since 2010 while information postulation grew 341x. Per unit, infrastructure gets cheaper forever. But the premium sat pinch contracted, guaranteed capacity. Tower maestro lease agreements are the original SLA business, and the building landlords quadrupled gross connected semipermanent contracts while the carriers fought a value warfare underneath them. Commoditized furniture intends value war. Contracted furniture intends pricing power. That is the instruction DePIN needs.
The norm has a name
Clayton Christensen formulated this norm down successful 2003. When 1 furniture of a stack commoditizes, the charismatic profits migrate to an adjacent furniture that still offers unsocial worth aliases lick difficult problem [15]. In infrastructure examples truthful far, that intends moving superior to services connected apical of infrastructure. Different lit has known versions of it for decades, from Perez’s exertion cycles to Carr’s large move [16][17][18][19]; Perez moreover predicted the sequencing, pinch the deployment shape arriving aft a financial crash, which maps a small excessively good onto the 2022 and now 2026 crypto bear.
Is the aforesaid book moving wrong crypto today?
The shape wherever infrastructure turns invisible is already observable successful crypto astatine large. Kalshi users waste and acquisition ovum prices and NFL games. PYUSD holders spot PayPal. The concatenation underneath is of liking of tech enthusiasts and blockchain purists. Even Hyperliquid is the adjacent case. Its users mightiness cognize precisely what concatenation they are on, but they acquisition an exchange-grade merchandise first and a concatenation second, and its $844M of 2025 gross outearned Ethereum itself, though not Solana [20].
Table 3. Products wherever crypto is simply a feature, not the product.
| Kalshi | CFTC-regulated prediction marketplace app | Crypto deposit rails via Zero Hash (USDC, BTC, SOL) | $263.5M gross successful 2025; $22B valuation (May 2026); ~2M MAU [21] |
| Hyperliquid | CEX-grade perp trading app, concatenation invisible successful the UX | Its ain purpose-built L1 | $2.95T measurement and $844M gross successful 2025 [20] |
| LayerZero / PYUSD | Tokens that conscionable activity crossed chains; PYUSD holders spot PayPal | Omnichain messaging, 90+ chains | PayPal’s PYUSD runs connected it; Google Cloud operates a verifier node [22] |
| Stablecoins | Dollars that settee successful seconds | Public blockchains | $310B+ supply; $10.2T adjusted 12-month transportation measurement (Visa/Allium, Aug 2026 pull); GENIUS Act signed July 2025 [23][24] |
Every infrastructure assemblage that matured ran this aforesaid script. Crypto is not the exception. It is the newest re-run, and that is simply a existent awesome that the manufacture is maturing and going mainstream.
II. The Evidence
Can we moreover spot the existent gross successful DePIN today?
If we want to make a adjacent comparison, we request to comparison apples to apples. With each crypto on-chain transparency, we are still horrendous astatine reporting companies’ revenues. And particularly bad if gross comes from off-chain sources. The array beneath is the closest point that is imaginable to propulsion together for the gross trajectory analysis. DePIN has nary audited reporting standard. As projects move to endeavor deals, gross becomes a achromatic box. Contracts settee off-chain, disclosures are blog posts, and nationalist narratives tin beryllium shaped by whoever writes the listicle. During the audit for this article, 1 wide circulated fig turned retired to beryllium a project’s 2022 backing information recycled arsenic its 2026 revenue. So beryllium prepared to return immoderate crypto gross number coming pinch a atom of salt. The information present is for acquisition purposes, not for diligence.
No audited modular exists successful this sector!
Table 4. DePIN gross “leaders”, what they sell, and really overmuch to spot each number (2025-2026).
| Aethir | $127.8M FY2025 [25] | Self-reported, unaudited; net-vs-gross undisclosed | Off-chain endeavor fiat contracts | GPU-as-a-service for AI and gaming, “150+ partners & customers” (company claim) | H100 pricing, spot Table 6 [26] |
| Storj | ~$13M ARR 2025 [27] | Company statements; Chapter 11 July 2026 [1] | Fiat contracts pinch Web2 companies | S3-compatible storage, ~$4/TB/mo vs S3 ~$23/TB/mo | AWS S3 |
| GEODNET | $8.3M ARR 2026 claim; verified guidelines Q3 2025 $1.23M, +216% YoY [28] | Claim supra a verified Messari base | Fiat/USDC subscriptions, 80% costs token buyback | Centimeter-accurate positioning for tractors, drones, and robots; DroneDeploy, Quectel, Propeller | $40/mo vs Trimble-style networks ~$600-1,000+/yr |
| io.net | Q1 2025 $5.7M; ARR est. ~$12.5M (third-party annualization) [29] | Messari quarterly + third-party annualization | Marketplace; GMV vs gross must beryllium flagged (GMV: full flowing done the marketplace, not the company’s take) | GPU marketplace for AI teams | See Table 6 |
| Hivemapper / Bee Maps | Six and seven-figure endeavor deals; nary verified full [30] | CEO statement; the “$18M annualized” listicle fig grounded audit | Map-data contracts | Street-level imagery for VW robotaxi program, Lyft, Mapbox, NBC | Google Street View |
| Helium Mobile | Consumer marque acquired by Noble Mobile, June 2026; position undisclosed, reportedly not profitable [31] | Fortune reporting + Helium’s ain announcement; anterior ~$23.5M ARR estimate retired | MVNO subscriptions successful fiat; Helium squad pivots to trading web entree to carriers | Mobile plans $15-30/mo vs US mean unlimited $65-75/mo | Big-3 carriers |
| Akash | FY2025 $3.15M; Q1 2026 lease gross $253K, declining [32] | Messari on-chain data | On-chain lease payments | Permissionless compute for developers | Cheapest tier, nary endeavor SLA |
| Livepeer | ~$190K quarterly (Q4 2025, paywalled Messari figure) [33] | Messari on-chain data | On-chain fees | Video transcoding + AI video | AWS MediaConvert |
The array could beryllium publication successful the pursuing way. The winners waste subscriptions and contracts successful dollars, the decliners waste earthy capacity on-chain.
Two points connected the companies. Render is absent because it discloses nary USD gross astatine all. Their “$38M successful January” fig floating astir listicles was not verifiable anyhow other [34]. And Helium’s acquisition sounds some ways. A DePIN user marque getting acquired is the Mint Mobile play from Section I completing itself, the purchaser is Noble Mobile, Andrew Yang’s bearer startup, which committed to support moving subscribers connected the Helium Network while the Helium squad moves up the stack to waste web entree to different carriers [31]. The marque recovered a buyer, while the web became the supplier. Yet, reportedly it was ne'er profitable.
The measurement problem
Here is my favourite portion of statistic from this research. Messari, doing observant activity pinch the information that exists, counts astir $72M of on-chain gross for the full DePIN assemblage successful 2025. Aethir unsocial claims $127.8M, because endeavor contracts settee off-chain wherever dashboards cannot spot them [25][35]. The problem present is that cipher tin audit the nonstop number. The industry’s ain transparency characteristic cannot thief america to get the numbers right. We built the tool, but forgot to usage it for our ain sake.
Real contracts will determine the winners successful the space
Why do contracts determine who wins? Because of what an endeavor purchaser really asks for earlier a dollar moves. The compliance alphabet enterprises unrecorded by, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, DPA, SLA, MSA, is the wall each vendor climbs, and DePIN 1.0 could reply nary of it. Belief earlier was that crypto conscionable needed to amended group connected really to tally things successful a blockchain way, and past the take would come. Today the reply is the opposite. Projects person to accommodate and supply industry-standard contractual obligations, aliases they cannot exit the Web3 bubble, which is highly mini for infrastructure demand. For scale, endeavor unreality walk astir commonly peaks betwixt $100K and $500K per month, and costs ratio is the apical occurrence metric for 81% of organizations [36]. Table 5 covers everything other the purchaser asks first.
Table 5. The procurement wall: what the purchaser asks, what DePIN 1.0 had, what the winners built.
| SLA pinch uptime targets and financial remedies (a work level agreement: uptime guaranteed, credits paid erstwhile it fails) | None; best-effort network | AWS-league targets: Storj 99.95% availability, Titan Network 99.95% occurrence complaint (author’s company, spot disclosure), Aethir advertises endeavor SLAs pinch 24/7 support; hyperscaler benchmark 99.99% pinch gradual credits [37][27][38][39] |
| SOC 2 Type II / ISO 27001, GDPR DPA, information residency | None | Aethir KYC connected GPU providers; DeStor (Seal) SOC 2 and HIPAA [37][40] |
| MSA pinch an accountable ineligible entity (a maestro work agreement: a statement pinch personification you tin really sue) | Anonymous node operators | Service entity signs [31][28] |
| 24/7 support pinch escalation tiers | Discord | Enterprise support desks [37][27] |
| Predictable fiat billing | Hold and walk a volatile token | Invoices successful stablecoins, on-ramps successful dollars aliases nonstop dollar colony [28] |
Sources: endeavor procurement criteria and cloud-spend data, Flexera 2026 State of the Cloud [36]; SLA figures from supplier pages [38]. We had a token and a dashboard; they needed an MSA and a support line.
Disclosure. I co-founded Titan Network. The Titan figures present are mine. Treat them pinch the aforesaid skepticism arsenic immoderate founder’s.
I watched the wall win, from the inside
In 2021 and 2022, I was a Startup Operator successful the Filecoin ecosystem astatine Protocol Labs. I onboarded much than a 100 teams. The exertion worked. The retention proofs were real. And each endeavor speech deed the aforesaid wall.
“Do you person an SLA and who would beryllium liable successful lawsuit of work failures?”
Nobody wanted to dangle connected a web of miners to shop their information successful a decentralized way, without azygous org responsibility. Nobody wanted to clasp FIL. Nobody wanted to discuss pinch anonymous retention providers. They wanted a contract, a responsible entity, and an invoice successful dollars.
The enterprises that did shop information connected Filecoin went done work wrappers: Seal Storage, Estuary, FilSwan, companies pinch compliant structures and MSAs [40]. Some wrappers did not survive: Estuary unopen down successful 2023, FilSwan exited the storage-provider business successful February 2023, Textile’s buckets were discontinued successful January 2023, the original Web3.Storage API was deprecated successful January 2024 [41]. The survivors, Seal via DeStor pinch SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance, Akave pinch S3-compatible endeavor storage, survived because they sold services, not infrastructure [40][42]. The ecosystem keeps trying: DeStor has since been folded into FIL One, an S3-compatible retention work astatine $4.99/TB per period sounded astatine the AI era. As of August 2026, its tract lists SOC 2 Type II arsenic still successful progress, truthful whether the relaunch captures endeavor take remains to beryllium seen [43].
The Storj’s caller playbook?
In Part 1, I held Storj up arsenic 1 of 2 projects successful the full assemblage pinch existent revenue. Cleanest hybrid exemplary successful decentralized storage, astir $13M successful ARR by institution statements, sevenfold maturation successful 2024, existent Web2 customers, a published 99.95% readiness fig [27].
Sixteen weeks aft Part 1 went out, Storj Labs revenge for Chapter 11 [1].
The web keeps operating. The institution says it expects nary work interruptions. The restructuring scheme proposes sharing ownership of the reorganized institution among management, investors, and token holders, who usually get thing successful a Chapter 11. And the framing successful Storj’s ain restructuring announcement is the probable pathing for galore infrastructure startups successful DePIN space: “The business underneath is beardown and right-sized. What holds it backmost are bequest obligations from an earlier chapter” [1].
Helium Mobile is the 2nd datapoint successful the aforesaid shape. Real service, existent subscribers, sold without ever reaching profit [31]. The biggest nonaccomplishment landed connected retail, who bought tokens connected the committedness of product-market fit. Now moreover the projects that achieved product-market fresh and signed the deals are trying to get retired from nether their token-era obligations. That is what “legacy obligations from an earlier chapter” intends successful plain connection [1].
So why does the hybrid exemplary triumph anyway?
Because the token portion solved a problem thing other could. Token incentives are a existent mechanism-design innovation. They ace the cold-start problem of two-sided markets by bootstrapping proviso without CapEx, thing nary Web2 marketplace ever managed. DePIN 1.0’s nonaccomplishment was not the subsidy. It was subsidizing 1 broadside everlastingly pinch nary request loop, and ne'er making the marketplace safe for buyers: nary SLA, nary accountable counterparty, nary value guarantee. The solution was to repetition the manufacture standards and bring an accountable work entity opinionated betwixt the web and the customer. The intermediary arsenic value guarantor, which crypto tried to destruct successful the first place. GEODNET moreover closed the loop DePIN 1.0 ne'er had, pushing 80% of gross into token buybacks [28]. And announcement what nary of the winners do: lead pinch decentralization successful the income call.
Crypto had a token and a chain. Enterprises needed an SLA and a support line. The winners built the 2nd point connected apical of the first.
III. The Inflection Point
Capital is moving up the stack, and the MOAT question
DePIN raised a grounds ~$1B successful backstage backing successful 2025, and the funded deals look different. Bee Maps’ $32M round, co-led by Pantera, was for map-data contracts pinch VW and Lyft, not hotspot subsidies [30][35]. Sector leaders now waste and acquisition astatine 10-25x gross against 1,000x+ successful 2021. Multiples compressing toward SaaS norms intends the marketplace has started pricing these arsenic businesses, not tokens, while equity becomes the driver of the fundraising position [35].
Which forces a mobility to the industry: What is the defensible advantage of decentralized supply?
Table 6. What an H100 GPU-hour costs, by supplier type (accessed August 9, 2026; each statement publically linkable, spot [26]).
| Hyperscaler | AWS (p5.48xlarge, derived per GPU) | ~$6.88 | On-demand, 8-GPU lawsuit only |
| Hyperscaler | Azure (NC40ads H100 v5) | ~$6.98 | On-demand, single-GPU VM |
| Hyperscaler | GCP (a3-highgpu-8g, derived per GPU) | ~$11.06 | On-demand, ain pricing page |
| Neo-cloud (centralized) | RunPod | $2.99 | H100 SXM, organization cloud, ain pricing page |
| Neo-cloud (centralized) | CoreWeave | $6.16 on-demand ($2.46 spot) | HGX H100, 8-GPU instance, ain pricing page |
| Neo-cloud (centralized) | Lambda | $3.99 | H100 SXM on-demand, ain pricing page |
| DePIN | Spheron | $2.98 (live marketplace rate) | Own pricing page, moves pinch supply |
| DePIN | Fluence | $1.50-1.73 (H100 SXM5 VM configs) | Company blog, Nov 2025, not a unrecorded pricing page |
| DePIN | Aethir | $1.25 | Own endeavor pricing page; nary committedness position disclosed |
Sources and per-row links successful [26]. Prices are on-demand database rates connected the stated date; marketplace rates move. Against hyperscalers the discount is real, astir 50-75%. Against centralized neo-clouds the ranges overlap, and the lowest DePIN stickers travel pinch undisclosed terms.
Previously, DePIN competed connected price, and the value was subsidized by token emissions. That era is now over. The token subsidies are dormant and the prices person mostly equalized. Time to look for much defensible MOATs. My group of durable candidates: proviso elasticity, geographic distribution for separator and data-residency workloads, coordination of crowdsourced infrastructure and jurisdiction diversity. Where nary of those bind, the winners’ moat is the aforesaid arsenic immoderate unreality vendor’s, contracts and customer relationships, pinch a token-incentivized proviso concatenation underneath.
Where are we connected the commoditisation curve?
I judge DePIN successful 2026 sits astir wherever unreality sat successful 2010-2012, aft the earthy furniture proved itself and earlier the work detonation connected top.
The naming problem
Right now “DePIN” covers some of these: a task paying group to plug successful hotspots pinch nary paying customers, and a task trading endeavor GPU compute nether contracts astatine a self-reported $127.8M a twelvemonth [25]. That is simply a applicable problem, and it costs everyone. Investors cannot value the difference. Enterprise buyers cannot find the serviceable projects. Builders purpose astatine the incorrect target because the celebrated explanation rewards the incorrect behavior. And assemblage statistic go garbage. The measurement problem supra already showed the header number missing the largest self-reported subordinate wholly [25][35].
I person 1 prediction. By the extremity of 2027, the mostly of DePIN demand-side gross will settee off-chain nether endeavor contracts, and the on-chain dashboards will beryllium search a number share.
What I will not do present is coin the caller meaning for the winners successful the abstraction pinch existent contracts. The assemblage needs one, pinch difficult inclusion criteria, and that deserves its ain article.
The stablecoin parallel
In each infrastructure cycle, the money ends up pinch whoever sells contracted work connected commoditized supply, and crypto is nary different.
Stablecoins are crypto’s first slayer characteristic to really scope the mainstream. More than $310B successful supply, $10.2T successful adjusted yearly transportation volume, a US national rule successful the GENIUS Act, Circle connected the NYSE, Stripe paying $1.1B for Bridge and co-building a colony chain, Tempo, pinch Paradigm [23][24]. The users of these rails progressively do not cognize they are utilizing crypto. That is what winning looks like.
DePIN tin go the 2nd crypto slayer feature, but connected 1 condition. Projects support building services for existent customers alternatively of moving for vanity metrics.
The clip of monetizing hype without traction is gone. The subject that stablecoin rule now demands audited reserves and existent reporting is coming for DePIN sooner aliases later. Long term, only projects that tin show orders and gross connected the books will survive; the self-reported gross announcement will dice retired arsenic a genre. If the CLARITY Act passes, crypto gets a ineligible playbook that will transportation to the remainder of the industry, and ineligible framing will assistance the projects doing things correct coming and termination the rest.
The assemblage needs a class pinch difficult inclusion criteria for the projects that crossed the line. The adjacent article will sanction it, tie the line, and show what it intends for superior allocation.
Stablecoins proved crypto tin vanish into a merchandise group really use. DePIN is adjacent successful line, but only for the projects that waste services, not stories.
References
[1] Storj Labs Chapter 11 filing, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of West Virginia. Storj property release, “Storj Announces Voluntary Financial Restructuring to Resolve Legacy Liabilities and Position the Business for Growth,” GlobeNewswire, July 26, 2026 (quote “The business underneath is beardown and right-sized. What holds it backmost are bequest obligations from an earlier chapter,” attributed successful the merchandise to Kaloyan Raev, Director of Software Engineering); CoinDesk, “Cloud Data Firm Storj Files for Chapter 11,” July 27, 2026 (no expected work interruptions; reorganized ownership shared among management, investors, and token holders; STORJ fell 16% to ~$0.06, ~98% beneath its 2021 peak). https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/26/3333224/0/en/ and https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/07/27/cloud-data-firm-storj-files-for-chapter-11-extending-a-week-of-crypto-failures-token-slides-16
[2] Amazon.com Inc., Form 10-K filings, FY2015-FY2025, AWS conception reporting, SEC EDGAR. (2017 note: AWS exceeded 100% of Amazon operating income because International conception losses of $3.06B exceeded North America unit profit of $2.84B.)
[3] Amazon.com Inc., Q4 2025 net release, February 5, 2026, SEC EDGAR. AWS FY2025: $128.7B nett sales, $45.6B operating income (57% of Amazon’s $80.0B total; AWS 18% of $716.9B full nett sales). CEO guidance: “about $200 cardinal successful superior expenditures crossed Amazon successful 2026.” https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1018724/000101872426000002/amzn-20251231xex991.htm
[4] CloudZero, “Inside Netflix’s AWS Strategy.” AWS walk estimated astatine $1.0-1.3B per year; estimate only, Netflix does not disclose. Caveat: video transportation runs connected Netflix’s ain Open Connect CDN; AWS runs compute and storage. https://www.cloudzero.com/blog/netflix-aws/
[5] Netflix Q4 2025 net study and shareholder letter, January 2026. FY2025 gross $45.2B.
[6] Snowflake Q4 FY2026 net release, February 2026. Product gross $4,472.3M (+29% YoY).
[7] Datadog Q4/FY2025 net release, February 10, 2026 ($3.43B); Zoom Q4 FY2026 net release, February 25, 2026 ($4,868.8M); Airbnb Q4/FY2025 net report, February 2026 ($12.2B).
[8] Gartner, “Gartner Forecasts Worldwide Public Cloud End-User Spending to Total $723 Billion successful 2025,” November 19, 2024 (total 2024: $595.7B; 2025 forecast: $723.4B; SaaS 2024: $250.8B; SaaS 2025 forecast: $299.1B). The $1 trillion successful 2027 projection is from Gartner, “Gartner Says Cloud Will Become a Business Necessity by 2028,” November 29, 2023. Diagram 1’s IaaS statement uses Gartner’s abstracted vendor-revenue actuals series, 2016-2024: “Gartner Says Worldwide IaaS Public Cloud Services Market Grew 22.5% successful 2024,” August 6, 2025 ($171.8B successful 2024; 2023 restated to $140.2B). The 2 Gartner bid usage different methodologies (vendor-revenue actuals vs end-user spending); the sketch keeps 1 vintage per line. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-19-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-public-cloud-end-user-spending-to-total-723-billion-dollars-in-2025 and https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-08-06-gartner-says-worldwide-iaas-public-cloud-services-market-grew-22-point-5-percent-in-2024
[9] T-Mobile acquisition of Ka’ena Corporation (parent of Mint Mobile, Ultra Mobile, Plum), up to $1.35B, earnout-contingent, closed May 1, 2024. Ryan Reynolds was a portion proprietor and remains the brand’s pitchman.
[10] GSMA Intelligence, “A person look astatine MVNOs” (2,100+ MVNOs crossed ~100 countries). Market size: IMARC $88.7B (2025), Fortune Business Insights $98.7B (2025); definitions vary. https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/blogs/a-closer-look-at-mvnos-what-2100-mvnos-tell-us-about-the-trends-shifts-and-the-outlook
[11] American Tower Corporation yearly reports and Q4/FY2024 results. Revenue: 2010 $1.99B; 2015 $4.77B; 2020 $8.04B; 2024 $10.13B.
[12] Crown Castle Inc. yearly reports. Revenue: 2010 $1.88B; 2015 $3.66B; 2020 $5.84B; 2024 $6.57B arsenic reported ($4.46B continuing operations aft the 2025 fibre divestiture).
[13] SBA Communications Corporation yearly reports. Revenue: 2010 $0.63B; 2015 $1.64B; 2020 $2.08B; 2024 $2.68B.
[14] CTIA, Annual Wireless Industry Survey, 2025 version (data done 2024). Service gross 2010 $159.9B, 2015 $191.9B, 2020 $189.9B, 2024 $224.9B; ARPU $47.53 / $44.65 / $35.31 / $33.36; information postulation grew 341x since 2010. https://api.ctia.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/2025-CTIA-Survey-Summary-and-Background.pdf
[15] Christensen, C.M. and Raynor, M.E. (2003). The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth, ch. 6 (law of conservation of charismatic profits). Harvard Business School Press.
[16] Perez, C. (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Edward Elgar.
[17] Mudambi, R. (2008). “Location, Control and Innovation successful Knowledge-Intensive Industries.” Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), 699-725.
[18] Isenberg, D.S. (1997). “The Rise of the Stupid Network.” Computer Telephony, August 1997, 16-26.
[19] Carr, N.G. (2008). The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, from Edison to Google. W.W. Norton. See besides Carr (2003), “IT Doesn’t Matter,” Harvard Business Review, 81(5).
[20] Hyperliquid FY2025: $2.95T cumulative volume, ~$844M gross (ASXN data, December 2025/January 2026). Chain comparison: Solana ~$1.3-1.4B, Hyperliquid ~$844M, Ethereum ~$524M successful 2025 (BlockEden, January 10, 2026); gross concepts disagree (exchange fees vs L1 fees/burn). https://blockeden.xyz/blog/2026/01/10/hyperliquid-revenue-dominance-onchain-trading-solana/
[21] Kalshi: 2025 gross $263.5M and ~2M MAU (Forbes, June 1, 2026); $1B Series F astatine $22B valuation, May 2026, led by Coatue (Bloomberg, May 7, 2026); crypto deposits via Zero Hash (USDC, BTC, SOL) (The Block, May 23, 2025). https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2026/06/01/kalshis-ceo-wants-to-turn-every-question-into-a-market/
[22] PayPal developer blog, “Building the Future of Stablecoin Interoperability: PYUSD and LayerZero” (PYUSD connected LayerZero’s OFT standard); Fortune, September 12, 2023 (Google Cloud operates a LayerZero verifier); Messari, “Understanding LayerZero” (90+ chains; paywalled). https://developer.paypal.com/community/blog/pyusd-layerzero/
[23] Visa Onchain Analytics (Allium data), visaonchainanalytics.com: trailing 12-month adjusted stablecoin transportation measurement ~$10.2T (August 2026 pull); full proviso $310-322B crossed mid-2026 snapshots.
[24] GENIUS Act, Public Law 119-27, signed July 18, 2025. Circle IPO June 5, 2025, NYSE: CRCL. Stripe: Bridge acquisition ~$1.1B, closed February 2025 (CNBC, February 4, 2025); Tempo L1 co-incubated pinch Paradigm, announced September 2025.
[25] Aethir, “Aethir’s 2025 Wrap-Up” (January 2026): FY2025 gross $127.8M+, “150+ partners & customers,” 439K GPU containers. Unaudited, self-reported; net-vs-gross undisclosed. No 2026 figures published arsenic of August 2026. https://aethir.com/blog-posts/aethirs-2025-wrap-up-decentralized-gpu-cloud-milestones
[26] H100 GPU-hour pricing, each accessed August 9, 2026: AWS p5.48xlarge $55.04/hr on-demand = $6.88/GPU-hr (instances.vantage.sh/aws/ec2/p5.48xlarge; AWS’s ain page loads prices dynamically); Azure NC40ads H100 v5 $6.98/hr (instances.vantage.sh/azure/vm/nc40adsh100-v5); GCP a3-highgpu-8g $88.49/hr = $11.06/GPU-hr (cloud.google.com/products/compute/pricing/accelerator-optimized); RunPod H100 SXM $2.99 (runpod.io/pricing); CoreWeave HGX H100 $49.24/hr = $6.16/GPU-hr on-demand, spot $19.71/hr = $2.46 (coreweave.com/pricing); Lambda H100 SXM $3.99 (lambda.ai/service/gpu-cloud); Spheron H100 $2.98 unrecorded marketplace complaint (spheron.network/pricing; rental page lists from $3.38); Fluence H100 SXM5 VMs $1.50-1.73 (fluence.network/blog/nvidia-h100-deep-dive, November 2025); Aethir $1.25 (enterprise.aethir.com/Pricing, nary committedness position disclosed). Directional cross-check only (its snapshot dates differ): CloudZero, “H100 GPU Cost In 2026,” May 20, 2026.
[27] Storj: “Storj Increases Revenue Sevenfold In 2024, Enters 2025 In High-Growth Mode,” PRNewswire, December 10, 2024 (sevenfold ARR growth; merchandise contains nary dollar figure). ~$13M ARR: Storj institution statement, August 2025 (x.com/storj). 99.95% published readiness fig (storj.io/benefits/availability-and-durability).
[28] Messari, “State of GEODNET Q3 2025”: quarterly gross $1.23M, +216% YoY (paywalled; corroborated successful secondary coverage). $8.3M ARR 2026 is simply a secondary third-party declare supra that verified base. Pricing $40/month (store.geodnet.com, billed successful USD) vs Trimble-style RTK correction services ~$600-1,000+/yr. 80% of gross costs GEOD buyback. Customers: DroneDeploy (Businesswire, February 2025), Quectel, Propeller.
[29] Messari, “State of io.net Q1 2025”: Q1 2025 gross $5.7M (paywalled; corroborated successful secondary coverage). ARR ~$12.5M is simply a third-party annualization.
[30] Bee Maps (Hivemapper): $32M raise co-led by Pantera Capital (with LDA, Borderless, Ajna), October 2025; customers see Volkswagen’s robotaxi program, Lyft, Mapbox, NBC (PRNewswire, October 6, 2025; merchandise contains nary gross figures). CEO Ariel Seidman: “six and seven-figure deals” (Blockworks). The “$18M annualized” fig circulating successful listicles grounded verification and apt echoes Hivemapper’s 2022 $18M backing information (CoinDesk, April 5, 2022).
[31] Helium Mobile user marque acquired by Noble Mobile (founded 2025 by Andrew Yang), announced June 2, 2026 (blog.heliummobile.com/noble). Noble commits to utilizing the Helium Network; subscribers support plans and token rewards; Helium squad pivots to a carrier-facing web platform. Fortune, June 2, 2026: position undisclosed; “Helium Mobile is not profitable” (COO Frank Mong); ~600K fig is cumulative sign-ups including churned users. Prior ~$23.5M ARR third-party estimate retired.
[32] Messari, “State of Akash” series: FY2025 gross $3.15M, +128% YoY; Q1 2026 lease gross $253K, down 45% QoQ (paywalled; corroborated successful secondary coverage). Akash’s separately self-reported ~$5M Q1 2026 “compute spend” is simply a different metric; do not mix.
[33] Messari, “State of Livepeer Q4 2025”: demand-side fees ~$190K (paywalled figure, not independently corroborated; bid of magnitude accordant pinch Livepeer’s humanities quarterly fees).
[34] Messari, “Understanding the Render Network”: USD gross not disclosed; OTOY publishes pain counts, not dollar revenue. The “$38M January 2026” declare circulating successful listicles is unverified.
[35] Messari, “State of DePIN 2025,” January 29, 2026: ~$72M FY2025 on-chain gross (on-chain only; off-chain endeavor contracts not counted), leaders astatine 10-25x gross multiples, grounds ~$1B backstage backing successful 2025 (up from $698M successful 2024). The 2021 multiples comparator (1,000x+) is from the study itself; it does not look successful free coverage.
[36] Flexera, 2026 State of the Cloud Report: costs ratio is the apical unreality occurrence metric for 81% of organizations; endeavor monthly unreality walk astir commonly peaks betwixt $100K and $500K. https://www.flexera.com/blog/finops/flexera-2026-state-of-the-cloud-report-the-convergence-of-cloud-and-value/
[37] Aethir endeavor and archiving pages (accessed August 9, 2026): enterprise.aethir.com (“24/7 support and robust SLAs”); docs.aethir.com KYC/KYB verification via Sumsub (required for Cloud Hosts to declare aliases retreat ATH); Cloud Host operational requirements (99% monthly uptime work level objectives pinch slashing penalties). Note: contractual SLA position are marketing-page claims, not published contracts.
[38] Hyperscaler SLAs, supplier pages (accessed August 9, 2026): AWS Compute SLA 99.99% region-level pinch credits of 10/30/100% beneath 99.99/99.0/95.0 (aws.amazon.com/compute/sla); Azure Virtual Machines 99.99% pinch instances crossed 2+ readiness zones; Google Compute Engine 99.99% multi-zone (cloud.google.com/compute/sla).
[39] Titan Network: 99.9% uptime SLA published astatine titannet.io/web-services; the 99.95% occurrence complaint fig successful Table 5 is the author’s existent founder-sourced number. Customers named connected the nationalist merchandise page: iQIYI, Volcengine, Tencent; TikTok, Baidu, NetEase, Bilibili look successful company-published materials only (Chainwire, May 2025). Cloudflare is simply a reseller partnership, not a customer. Founder root (author); spot in-body disclosure.
[40] Seal Storage / DeStor: SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance (sealstorage.io); clients see UC Berkeley (neutrino physics investigation data, PRNewswire) and Starling Lab (Filecoin Foundation lawsuit study). destor.com now redirects to fil.one; spot [43].
[41] Filecoin service-wrapper shutdowns: Estuary discontinued 2023 (GitHub repository notice; original announcement nary longer publically accessible); FilSwan exited the storage-provider business February 7, 2023, migrating clients to Nebula Block (Swan Chain announcement); Textile buckets discontinued January 9, 2023 (deprecation notice); original Web3.Storage API deprecated January 9, 2024 (repository archive notice).
[42] Akave: S3-compatible endeavor entity retention connected Filecoin, nary egress fees, $6.65M seed (SiliconANGLE, March 2, 2026; investors see Protocol Labs and Filecoin Foundation).
[43] FIL One (fil.one, accessed August 9, 2026): S3-compatible retention connected Filecoin, $4.99/TB/month, nary egress fees; successor marque to DeStor (destor.com redirects to fil.one); nary customers named connected site; SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 listed arsenic successful progress; not mentioned successful Filecoin’s “2026 Filecoin Network Strategy” (filecoin.io blog, February 19, 2026).
English (US) · 
Indonesian (ID) · 
