I bask utilizing display-mirroring glasses arsenic a measurement to play Steam Deck games connected a large screen, and I’m ever connected the hunt for the champion pair. There’s still not 1 cleanable exemplary I tin urge to everyone, but Viture’s caller $299.99 Pro 2 person sharper-looking screens than models that costs hundreds more. It’s mostly acknowledgment to the elemental but effective diopter-adjusting dials that beryllium supra each eye.
The dials move the lenses, helping much group get the clarity they are hoping for retired of the box. These person been successful immoderate past models that sold for astir $400 aliases more, but now they’re successful glasses that costs a batch less. Most models person few, aliases no, built-in methods to amended clarity. The only recourse for blurry screens is to salary $50 for medicine lens inserts. That, aliases conscionable return the glasses. (The Pro 2 glasses support lenses, too, successful lawsuit the dials unsocial don’t help.)

Each broadside has 1 of these dials that move the optics.
Another perk present is the accordant sharpness crossed the Pro 2’s 50-degree section of view. I didn’t struggle to find a saccharine spot; their full FOV is easy to parse, beryllium it matter aliases different mini details, for illustration minimaps successful games aliases menus. Sure, their FOV is smaller than immoderate competitors, but I’ll return smaller and sharper complete bigger and blurrier.
Screen sharpness aside, the Pro 2 are basal screen-mirroring glasses without other features that fto you augment really large the screens are aliases wherever you tin put them virtually. Their micro OLED screens tin reflector aliases widen different device’s surface via a tethered USB-C relationship astatine up to 1080p pinch a 120Hz refresh complaint — modular stuff. They person buttons to set volume, brightness, and the screens’ colour temperature. They’re moreover simpler than Xreal’s A01 Plus, which includes a stabilization characteristic to support the screens still erstwhile you make mini caput movements, though it’s not a bully substitute for 3 degrees of freedom, a characteristic recovered successful pricier glasses that some of these lack.

The Xreal A01 Plus (left) adjacent to the Viture Pro 2 (right).
In lieu of fancier features, Viture aimed to make these comfortable capable to deterioration for hours, and it mostly succeeded. The Pro 2 glasses measurement 63 grams (just a gram much than the A01 Plus), and some person a subtle clamping unit that floats connected apical of my ears, rubbing the backmost of my caput alternatively of painfully pressing connected my cartilage. Their comfortableness fto maine play XCOM 2 and Red Dead Redemption 2 successful 90-minute spurts — longer than I usually beryllium down to play games. I could do that pinch the A01 Plus, too, but I needed $50 medicine lenses to get akin clarity to what the Pro 2 offers retired of the box. Even then, Xreal’s screens weren’t arsenic consistently crisp.
One of the biggest differences betwixt Viture and Xreal’s cheapest AR glasses and their pricier models is flimsier build quality. The Pro 2 and A01 Plus aren’t poorly designed, but the temple arms person much flex, and I noticed immoderate power connected the Pro 2’s correct temple arms during extended testing, which wasn’t pleasant to consciousness during these lukewarm months.
It’s delightful not conscionable to person much options successful the budget-friendly AR glasses space, but to person good options, too. If you’re considering your adjacent aliases first pair, the Pro 2 are fantabulous for the price. What they’re lacking successful features they dress up for pinch very bully image clarity.
Photography by Cameron Faulkner / The Verge
Follow topics and authors from this communicative to spot much for illustration this successful your personalized homepage provender and to person email updates.
English (US) ·
Indonesian (ID) ·