The Ultra-Processed Food Debate Is Missing How Americans Actually Eat

All ultra-processed foods are not created equal.

getty

The national authorities is getting person to answering 1 of the astir consequential questions successful U.S. nutrition policy: What precisely is an ultra-processed nutrient (UPF)?

The reply could style acold much than terminology. A meaning emerging from the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda could yet power dietary guidance, front-of-package labeling, organization nutrient procurement and really consumers deliberation astir thousands of foods.

That makes getting the explanation correct important. But defining ultra-processed foods is only half the job.

Policymakers besides request to understand really Americans really devour the foods captured by that definition, that is, really overmuch they eat, really often and what domiciled those foods play successful their wide diets.

Otherwise, we consequence confusing classification pinch nationalist wellness impact.

As I wrote precocious successful Forbes, “Consumers don’t eat classifications. They eat diets.” That favoritism should guideline the adjacent shape of the UPF debate.

Not All Consumption Is Equal

One situation pinch wide UPF classifications is the tremendous diverseness of foods they tin capture.

A nutrient consumed respective times a time and contributing important calories tin beryllium successful the aforesaid class arsenic thing eaten occasionally and successful humble quantities. Yet their imaginable contributions to obesity and chronic illness whitethorn beryllium very different.

My earlier Georgetown University research illustrates the distinction. Using NHANES data, we recovered that products specified arsenic sugar-sweetened beverages and packaged pastries contributed higher levels of calories and sweetener to Americans' diets, while candy accounted for little than 1.8% of full calories and only 6.4% of added sugar. The user investigation besides recovered that the healthiest user conception really purchased candy much often than the organization overall. In different words, foods that whitethorn stock an ultra-processed classification tin person very different depletion patterns and contributions to the diet.

This doesn't mean processing is irrelevant. Research has associated diets precocious successful foods commonly classified arsenic ultra-processed pinch obesity, cardiovascular illness and different adverse wellness outcomes. But important questions stay astir really and why these foods impact health.

If the nonsubjective is healthier Americans, classification should truthful beryllium the opening of the analysis, not the end.

Before translating a UPF meaning into informing labels, procurement standards aliases different interventions, policymakers should ask: How overmuch of these foods are Americans consuming? How frequently? What do they lend to calories and nutrients of concern? And would reducing their depletion meaningfully amended the wide diet?

Those questions tin thief separate meaningful population-health targets from foods whose UPF classification whitethorn matter considerably less.

The Lesson From Chile

Chile provides an important real-world test.

Beginning pinch a sweetened-beverage taxation alteration successful 2014 and followed by its Food Labeling and Advertising Law successful 2016, Chile implemented 1 of the world's astir broad packages of nutrition policies. Products exceeding specified levels of calories, sugar, sodium aliases saturated fat received salient achromatic extremity motion warnings. In 2018, Chile went further, banning tv advertizing of products carrying the warnings from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., sloppy of the audience.

These policies changed purchasing behavior. UNC-Chapel Hill research wished nett reductions successful purchases of 20.2% for sugar, 13.8% for sodium, 9.6% for saturated fat and 8.3% for calories from affected foods and beverages.

Those are meaningful accomplishments. But arsenic I documented successful a 2025 Georgetown University report examining front-of-pack labeling systems astir the world, changing purchases is not the aforesaid arsenic demonstrating amended diets aliases improved health. Chile illustrates that favoritism peculiarly well.

Despite this unusually broad operation of taxes, informing labels and advertizing restrictions, overweight and obesity person continued to rise. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) data show big overweight and obesity expanding from 72.6% successful 2015 (the twelvemonth earlier informing labels were introduced) to 78.8% successful 2022. PAHO projects the complaint could scope 87% by 2030.

That does not beryllium the policies had nary wellness benefit; obesity is influenced by galore factors, and without them rates conceivably could person risen moreover faster. But it does show why reductions successful purchases of targeted products cannot by themselves beryllium treated arsenic grounds that the underlying nationalist wellness problem has been solved.

Consumers tin acquisition little of a targeted nutrient but compensate elsewhere successful their diets. Manufacturers tin reformulate products without substantially changing full caloric intake. And policies covering packaged foods tin miss important depletion from restaurants and different foodservice venues.

Chile truthful shouldn't beryllium viewed simply arsenic grounds that informing labels activity aliases don't work. Its acquisition demonstrates why nutrition argumentation must travel the afloat concatenation - from really foods are classified, to really consumers respond, to what they really eat, and yet to whether wellness outcomes improve.

Stopping halfway tells america only portion of the story.

Labels Don't Eat Food. People Do.

Food labels tin supply useful accusation and power purchasing decisions. But investigation besides suggests that the aforesaid explanation does not impact each food, aliases each consumer, the aforesaid way.

Research connected Chile's informing explanation strategy recovered important purchasing changes successful immoderate nutrient categories, including juices and cereals, while uncovering small aliases nary effect for chocolates, candy and cookies. Other investigation suggests consumers whitethorn salary little attraction to warnings complete clip arsenic the labels go much familiar. The instruction isn't that labels don't work. It's that their effect depends partially connected what is being branded and who is making the choice.

That favoritism is particularly important because the consumers astir attentive to nutrition accusation whitethorn not beryllium those astir successful request of dietary change. Consumer segmentation research conducted by the Natural Marketing Institute for Georgetown University's Portion Balance Coalition recovered that nutrition accusation influenced purchases for 71% of the healthiest user segment, compared pinch conscionable 23% of the slightest health-active segment. The slightest health-active consumers besides had substantially higher rates of overweight and obesity.

That has important implications for UPF policy.

Consider 2 foods that warrant the aforesaid warning. One mightiness beryllium candy aliases cookies consumed occasionally and successful humble amounts. Another mightiness beryllium a sugary beverage aliases packaged pastry consumed much often and contributing substantially much calories aliases added sugars.

The informing whitethorn beryllium the same. But the depletion shape and imaginable nationalist wellness effect whitethorn beryllium rather different.

Measure What Matters

A depletion lens would make a national UPF meaning much useful, not less. It could thief policymakers prioritize foods according to their existent publication to American diets alternatively than treating each qualifying merchandise arsenic an balanced nationalist wellness concern.

That's peculiarly important erstwhile the class is truthful broad. FDA estimates that astir 70% of packaged products are commonly considered ultra-processed and that children person much than 60% of their calories from specified foods.

When a meaning captures that overmuch of the nutrient supply, classification unsocial tells america excessively little. Policymakers request to cognize which foods group devour most, really overmuch and really often, what they devour alternatively erstwhile behaviour changes, and whether those changes yet amended health.

A meaning tin show america what an ultra-processed nutrient is. How Americans devour it tells america really overmuch it matters. And ultimately, the measurement of bully nutrition argumentation isn't what we classify. It's whether Americans go healthier.