Though movies concerning disruptive tech founders are nothing new, 2026 has been unusually stacked alongside features that obtain a much additional crucial appearance at how Silicon Valley is reshaping our reality. Aaron Sorkin’s The Social Reckoningframes Mark Zuckerberg as a robotic villain whose ambitions are destabilizing society. Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s You Can See Everything paints a damning image of Theranos originator Elizabeth Holmes as she prepares for her ongoing stint in prison. After years of being extensively celebrated as a visionary, you can see how the larger narrative about Elon Musk has shifted in projects akin Alex Gibney’s Musk documentary. And during Luca Guadagnino’s Artificialis a dreary comedy, it is additionally a character study that makes Sam Altman appearance akin a manipulative sociopath.
Even although several of these movies are fictionalized dramas, all of them draws from the prosperity of crucial reporting that has revealed their subjects to be less-than-savory characters. You get the awareness that these filmmakers are trying to inform stories that are meant to resonate alongside audiences whose views of Big Tech have lengthy since begun to dim. But it additionally feels akin several of Hollywood’s biggest studios are eventually embracing the idea that the tech backlash isn’t letting up anytime soon.
Especially whenever you difference them to classics akin The Social Network, the latest motion of cinematic dramas according to Silicon Valley power struggles has been far small sympathetic to their chief figures. David Fincher’s 2010 movie leading Jesse Eisenberg presented Zuckerberg as a complex and misunderstood savant, but The Social Reckoning builds its narrative about the idea that the Facebook / Meta caput is a man whose obsession alongside growth poses an existential danger to democracy. By focusing on the allegations leveled by whistleblower Frances Haugen, the movie is capable to emphasize Zuckerberg’s community transformation into a mighty executive who wields autocratic control complete a multibillion-dollar social media empire.
What The Social Reckoning lacks in timeliness (The Wall Street Journal began reporting Haugen’s warnings in 2021) and stylistic flair, it makes up for in the way it connects Facebook / Meta’s former inner decisions to events that are motionless playing out in genuine time. The movie’s scenes that dig into Instagram’s negative impacts on teens’ mental health and the association between Facebook’s algorithm and the dispersed of misinformation awareness as if they’re speaking immediately to present-day concerns concerning how much power Meta has complete people’s lives. Similarly, Gibney’s Musk documentary acts as the two a chronicle of the xAI / SpaceX head’s former and an enquiry into why the community was always consenting to let Musk accrue so much power inside governments throughout the world.
Musk’s reply to Gibney’s movie has been telling. X has blocked the characteristic from being advertised on the platform, and Musk — a self-proclaimed “free address absolutist” — has threatened to obtain lawful act against Gibney for producing a “hit piece.” It wasn’t entirely amazing to see Musk personally badmouthing a project that casts him in a negative light, but it was inquisitive to see the Musk ads initially missing from another social media platforms, including YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok.
Though the Meta subsidiaries and YouTube ultimately reversed their decisions, TikTok has stuck to its guns — which feels notable stated the company’s indirect connections to the Trump administration by way of Skydance Corporation CEO David Ellison. David’s begetter — Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison — is a longtime Donald Trump supporter and among the American billionaires who led the consortium of investors that purchased TikTok’s US endeavor delayed final year. Ellison has reportedly promised Gibney that Musk volition air on HBO (now a part of Skydance) sometime next January. The movie is currently screening in choose theaters, but it is difficult to contend that it hasn’t had to agreement alongside an different amount of exterior interference in the weeks foremost up to its release.
Guadagnino’s Artificial — which was initially going to be released by Amazon — additionally faced unexpected promotion challenges this year. The streaming giant backed out of its agreement to allocate the movie this former June, fair months following announcing that it was investing $50 milliard in OpenAI. All of that made it appear extremely much akin Amazon and another studios financially engaged alongside AI companies power be cooling on the idea of releasing projects crucial of the technology’s creators. Now that Artificial has begun screening and group have a awareness of how it takes Altman to task, it’s uncomplicated to see why Amazon didn’t desire to have its name attached. More than item else, that decision may be what convinces group to see Artificial in theaters whenever it releases extensively on December 25th, and OpenAI’s impending IPO could create the movie’s messages concerning Altman awareness that much additional relevant.
What sets Fielder’s You Can See Everything distinct from all of these another latest tech films is how straightforward a perspective it gives you into the genuine existence of its subject. The documentary’s manufacturing began fine following Holmes had already been sentenced to additional than 11 years in prison, and Fielder uses his admission to grill her concerning why she doesn’t accept that she defrauded Theranos investors. Invited to live alongside Holmes and her partner William Evans in a rental residence during the duration before she was set to commencement her sentence, Fielder allows himself to rotate into a character who can’t entirely inform whether his hosts’ expected desire for extreme transparency is genuine.
That chief strain turns You Can See Everything into a amazingly fascinating observe that challenges you to regard who’s really in authority of the documentary. Throughout the movie, Fielder often wonders if Holmes is using him as part of her latest PR campaign, and he leaves the spectators to diagram their own conclusions.
It frequently feels akin Fielder is asking viewers to really hear to how Holmes presents herself on camera and afterward reconcile that individual alongside what you power have peruse concerning Holmes in the news or seen in Hulu’s The Dropout. Whether or not Holmes is really fair a committed performer who’s trying to manipulate the community shapes all attack of the film, and it makes You Can See Everything awareness akin a really in-depth and honest inspection of one of Silicon Valley’s most infamous figures — one who’s already captured so much of the public’s attention.
Even although some of these films have been box agency flops, their beingness reflects a larger traditional change in how group are thinking concerning contemporary innovation and the powers rearward it. Hollywood has spent years poking fun at and mythologizing founders, and portions of the industry are eventually beginning to obtain a additional crucial view. As we continue to agreement alongside the fallout of things akin Elon Musk’s tenure at DOGE and OpenAI’s quest to roast generative AI into all aspect of our lives, audiences’ appetites for movies akin these could grow. And alongside all of these founders racing to monopolize the next tech frontier, the amusement industry volition likely have plentifulness of origin matter to diagram from.
Follow topics and authors from this narrative to see additional akin this in your personalized homepage nourish and to obtain email updates.
