Meta has tweaked its endeavor conditions to eliminate tongue suggesting that it could openly train its AI models on news sites, akin The Verge — but lawful experts say these changes aren’t adequate to location their concerns. “This does nothing to restrict the ‘associated alongside your products or services’ [language] that would let Meta scrape complete sites,” James Grimmelmann, a prof of digital and data law at Cornell Law School, tells Nieman Lab.

Initially, Meta’s new conditions for endeavor accounts appeared to give the business approval to train its AI on news sites. The terms, which go into consequence October 30th, stated that Meta “may use any content” from the websites connected alongside a endeavor document to “develop, research” and “train” Meta’s products. At the time, lawful experts told Nieman Lab that this could authorize Meta “to contend its business conditions supersede another blocking instructions,” such as the robots.txt file that has historically told scrapers (including hunt engines akin Google) what they are allowed to crawl.

Following fierce backlash from the publishing industry, Meta removed tongue saying it would “train” its products alongside scraped content. But the tweaks power not be adequate to regulation out that possibility. “The revised type of the new conditions motionless allows Meta to use that scraped satisfied to create any ‘business product.’ That doesn’t appear to be a defined term, and presumably Meta is evolving AI endeavor products. I think ‘develop’ is broad adequate to contain ‘train,’” Matt Topic, a media and intelligent asset attorney at Loevy & Loevy, tells Nieman Lab.

Meta has maintained that its new conditions aren’t designed to scrape news satisfied for free. In a declaration to The Verge today, Meta spokesman Daniel Roberts reiterated that “content owners can use robots.txt to indication their preferences,” adding that the update “is not concerning abrasion news sites, and these updates don’t provision us new entitlements that supersede those preferences.”

The agency attire code is changing, and for several professionals, workwear is becoming a grave investment.

At New York Fashion Week, Business Insider's Clarisa Melendez said alongside attendees who stated office manner can indication personality, confidence, and the benevolent of endeavor they conduct. Some of their most meaningful workwear investments came alongside eye-catching cost tags.

Consolidation is underway at David Ellison's Skydance fair a few weeks following the business closed its $110 milliard merger alongside Warner Bros. Discovery.

Skydance's chief merchandise officer, Dane Glasgow, laid out the merchandise and tech guidance construction of the blended being in a memo viewed by Business Insider.

Four top WBD executives are leaving, according to the memo.

They include:

• Avi Saxena, Warner Bros. Discovery's chief innovation officer
• Tyler Whitworth, chief merchandise authoritative for WBD's streaming business
• Dave Duvall, WBD's chief data officer
• Trish Collins Weedon, WBD's chief data safety authoritative (CISO)

Duvall, Saxena, and Whitworth volition remain on in an "advisory capability as we undergo this transition," Glasgow wrote.

The business is mostly keeping Paramount executives in accusation of its blended tech and merchandise organization.

These leaders include:

• Lakshman Nathan, Paramount's chief data officer
• Carlo Joseph, its chief data safety officer
• Jim Harrison, its administrator vice chairman of infrastructure, broadcast, and distribution
• Nick Lee, Paramount's administrator vice chairman of media systems

A few WBD executives are staying on in Skydance's post-merger leadership, per Glasgow's memo.

They include Brinton Miller, formerly WBD's media innovation and operations lead, who volition assist as Skydance's administrator vice chairman of manufacturing and studio technology, and James Crossland, formerly caput of earth satisfied operations at WBD, who volition assist as its EVP of earth satisfied operations.

Skydance has spent the former twelvemonth revamping its tech and merchandise team, frequently recruiting endowment from tech companies.

Glasgow joined Paramount from Meta, during Lee joined from Microsoft's AI division. Other squad leaders in its post-merger construction contain caput of design Suzanne Pellican, formerly a Google exec; Hugh Williams, a erstwhile Google, eBay, and Microsoft exec; and Barak Turovsky, who came to Paramount following serving as chief AI authoritative at General Motors and VP of AI at Cisco.

Bringing technical ability to Paramount has been a precedence for Ellison, who wants to rotate the century-old media brand into a modern, tech-forward endeavor akin Netflix. The business revamped its data and insights scheme in January, and merged several engineering teams in March to bolster its streaming tech.

"We are construction a merchandise and tech institution that can vie alongside anybody coming out of Silicon Valley," Ellison told CNBC before this month.

In his memo, Glasgow expressed gratitude for the activity of the two Paramount and WBD staffers, penning that he was "encouraged by the first collaboration, the bold new ideas you're bringing forward, and your openness to exploring new ways of operating alongside your colleagues."

He additionally acknowledged the structural changes could be disruptive.

"I cognize a alter of this measure brings questions, particularly as we get to cognize new teams and colleagues," Glasgow wrote. "Your leaders volition portion additional concerning their organizations in the coming weeks and we'll bring our teams together shortly to keep construction alongside and learning from all other."

Meta has re-enabled Muse sharing following safety researchers had reported that community conversation links could be uncomplicated to find. The researchers stated they had been capable to discover Muse pages akin a promotion company’s inner income assessment and a small endeavor owner’s debt application.

Researchers at Claroc reported earlier this week that Muse the web addresses for shared conversations from Muse were named following a conversation’s heading and written into community DNS. Ars Technica said Tuesday that Meta paused the sharing characteristic following it reached out concerning what was going on.

In a article today on X, Meta’s David Singleton says that “The underlying matter is now fixed, and sharing is rear on.” According to Singleton, the matter was alongside URLs for shared Muse artifacts, which Meta says are things akin documents and images inner Muse, and wasn’t a flaw alongside conversation sharing.

“If you shared an relic before the fix: it now has a new URL,” Singleton says. “Anyone visiting the old nexus volition see a note asking them to get the new one from you. We cognize that’s a pain, and we’re apologetic for the disruption — but protecting person data has to arrive first.”

Oh sure, SpaceX’s credit hazard is beautiful high since it’s concerning to get another $40 milliard to expend on Nvidia chips, but who cares concerning that? SpaceX and Tesla have cast particular committees to conversation a merger!

The Matt Levine case for the SpaceX-Tesla merger

It’s insane that they are distinct companies! One guy runs two gigantic bodily AI companies alongside huge overlaps! What a nightmare of conflicts of involvement and red tape! Just merge them, so that the one guy can arrive into the agency all day alongside a uncomplicated mandate: Make the choices that maximize general value for the elephantine AI complex, and for the shareholders of that complex. If several chips or engineers or drills or any have to be operating on robots, activity on the robots; if they have to be operating on data centers, activity on the data centers. The shareholders have arrive this far; certainly they rely Musk to create those decisions. It’s fair that correct now, operating on the robots is fine for Tesla and bad for SpaceX; operating on the data centers is bad for Tesla and fine for SpaceX. Musk can’t put the two of their interests first. There’s an uncomplicated fix.

Follow topics and authors from this narrative to see additional akin this in your personalized homepage nourish and to obtain email updates.

• Elizabeth Lopatto

Teenage Engineering is branching out into device amps alongside the previously leaked EP-35, a multi-input, multi-instrument, battery-powered amp alongside built-in effects. The rear of the component has a line-in port, as fine as a 1/4-inch guitar input and an XLR input for mics, including mics that necessitate phantom power. You can additionally stream audio to it via Bluetooth and nexus multiple EP-35s together complete Bluetooth using Auracast. If you have them paired in stereo, tilting a component to the remaining or correct sets it to the suitable stereo channel, which is beautiful neat.

There are distinct effects processors for guitar and vocals, although you have constricted authority complete them. Instead of adding, say, a postpone and dialing in the postpone time, you choice a style-based preset akin “blues,” “indie,” or “twang,” which applies a particular choice of effects, and you authority the “amount” alongside a sole knob. The vocal conduit plant the identical way, but alongside distinct effects akin “radio” and the all-essential “robo choir.”

TE is additionally offering a figure of accessories to brace alongside EP-35. The most engaging are the “amptenna,” which turns the component into an FM radio, and the EP–127 KO Pedal. The pedal is a wireless MIDI controller that gives you additional authority complete the built-in effects, unlocks a uncomplicated looper and metronome, and includes an expression pedal jack which can be used to authority the quantity of a selected conduit on the amp. And since the EP-127 additionally has a 3.5mm MIDI output and plant as an HID controller, it can additionally be used alongside your another synths, pedals, or equal to authority video playback from your computer.

The EP-35 amp is accessible now for $399.

It's costing families nearly $7,500 a twelvemonth for health insurance — and additional increases are looming.

A 2026 health benefits study from KFF established that workers on a family scheme paid an average of $7,471 a twelvemonth in premiums — a 9% addition from 2025. And that's fair the employee contribution — whenever accounting for director contributions, family scheme premiums totaled $28,303 in 2026, a approximately 5% addition from 2025.

That's a hefty price for the two workers and their employers, and equal additional acute for workers at smaller businesses: KFF's study established that at firms alongside small than 200 employees, they paid nearly $10,000 toward family premiums in 2026. Smaller firms are frequently additional beholden to coverage companies, since they don't wield the identical bargaining power as larger firms.

Mounting health costs power be part of why consumers awareness so gloomy: As wages have increased, coverage premiums have risen equal faster. While wages risen 3.7% year-over-year for workers — which power appearance akin a nice pay bump on document — worker-paid premiums outpaced that pay growth, rising by 9%.

And complete the former few years, how much workers pay for health plans has eaten up a larger portion of their family income. For workers throughout all firms, their premium expenses amounted to nearly 8% of genuine family median earnings in 2025.

Are you concerned concerning rising health coverage costs, or already paying thousands out of pocket? Share your narrative alongside this newsman at jkaplan@businessinsider.com.

All of that comes as employers and workers brace for open enrollment season, and additional hikes loom: An analysis from PricewaterhouseCoopers, according to a study of health scheme actuaries, projects that business healthcare collection expenses volition increase by 9% in 2027. Similarly, Aon, an coverage administration firm, established that director healthcare expenses are projected to ascend by 9.5% next twelvemonth without any disbursal mitigation measures — definition before firms fig out how to continue several of those mounting expenses on to their workers.

For workers and firms, that method a tighter financial squeeze: Companies are paying additional to shield their workers, but expenses are likely motionless outpacing wages. At the identical time, firms power not be capable to provision higher wages as attention expenses climb. It method that everyone is paying more, and nobody's emotion fine concerning it: An Ipsos/Axios poll established that 69% of Americans say a 10% addition would negatively effect their family finances, alongside 30% saying it would have a important negative impact.

Health coverage costs are going up, and it's particularly coarse for workers at small businesses.

A new annual study of employers and their health benefits from KFF established that small-business workers pay additional for family safety than workers at firms of all another size. At the identical time, many of these workers have small scheme choices than at larger firms, definition they're frequently stuck alongside any choice their director selected.

From 2025 to 2026, annual worker contributions for family safety at firms alongside 10 to 199 workers risen from $8,889 to $9,687, a 9% increase. While the largest firms saw a sharper increase, workers' contributions at employers alongside 5,000 or additional workforce were nearly $3,000 less. For all firms, contributions rosy concerning 9% to $7,471.

Of covered workers at small firms, nearly one in three has a scheme requiring an employee contribution of complete $12,000 annually, additional than twice the charge at ample firms.

According to the survey, 66% of small firms recommendation health benefits, compared alongside 98% of firms alongside 200 or additional workers. That's up from 59% in 2025 but remains below the 72% flat of five years ago.

Workers at small firms pay an average 37% of the family premium, compared alongside 25% at larger firms.

While premiums for health coverage plans that shield lone a employee and not their family are akin for small and ample businesses, the average deductible at small firms is nearly $1,000 higher than at ample firms. More than fractional of small-firm workers visage a deductible of at smallest $2,000, compared to fair a third of large-firm workers.

Though the study doesn't enter the discrepancy for family plans in depth, small businesses frequently have small bargaining power alongside insurers. Because small businesses run on smaller margins, they frequently don't have the prosperity to subsidize spouses and children at the identical flat as larger businesses. Risk is additionally additional concentrated among smaller businesses, definition that forthcoming premiums and claims may be heightened by a sole employee alongside costly medicinal needs.

Additionally, since small firms are much small apt to self-fund, they're frequently additional reliant on insurers and hence continue alongside charge increases to their workers. Average annual premiums rosy 5% in 2026, alongside employers citing projected disbursal increases, during the study separately established that GLP-1 coverage can power prescription-drug spending. Workers at small employers are additional apt to have weaker safety for specialty drugs.

Affordability is top of intellect for Americans gearing up to vote in the midterms. Healthcare expenses remain a top financial concern. Millions of Americans have lost health coverage as ACA market subsidies expired and Medicaid enrollment protections ended.

Small businesses have been hit difficult complete the former few years by inflation, higher involvement rates, and tariffs. Small businesses have been embracing AI as a cost-saving measure, although many visage unexpected expenses because of token overuse or subscription cost increases.

Dozens of workers have told Business Insider that preparing for withdrawal has been a important origin of emphasis as they navigate a tight job market. However, among employers that recommendation health benefits, 23% of firms alongside 200-999 workers recommendation retiree health benefits, versus 35% of firms alongside 5,000 or additional workers.

There are several argent linings for workers. Premiums for sole workers are slightly lesser at smaller firms than at larger ones overall. Employees at small firms on sole health coverage plans were much additional apt to have their complete premium paid by their employer, although they're additionally much additional apt to pay additional than fractional of the family premium. Among small firms offering coverage, nearly all recommendation family coverage.

Follow topics and authors from this narrative to see additional akin this in your personalized homepage nourish and to obtain email updates.

• Gaby Del Valle

As the US gets nearer to permanently adopting daylight preservation period following the House advancing the Sunshine Protection Act in July, there could be several unforeseen consequences to getting an additional hr of sun in the evening all twelvemonth long. Following the Canadian provinces of British Columbia and Manitoba permanently switching to daylight preservation this year, Google has shared several suggested fixes if Android devices are showing the incorrect period whenever clocks aren’t turned rear an hr there on November 1st.

In an announcement shared to the Android community assistance forums, Google suggests a uncomplicated fix for Canadians experiencing issues hence of latest period area changes. “If you are in Canada and your equipment is showing an incorrect period because of the new period area laws commencement Nov 1, delight use any pending updates from your phone’s manufacturer and Google, and afterward restart your device.”

If your equipment is motionless displaying an incorrect period or period zone, Google suggests enabling location-based period area finding by searching the “Date and Time” in Android’s settings and enabling the two the “Automatic period zone” and “Use location for period zone” options. If all alternatively fails, Google additionally suggests disabling “Automatic period zone” finding in the Android settings and manually selecting a period area that matches the accurate period offset for your region.

While daylight preservation period rules change from province to province in Canada (and equal inside smaller regions) making it occasionally difficult for devices to remain on top of changes in a timely manner, it volition possibly be small of an matter in the US if the complete nation decides to clasp imperishable daylight preservation period all at once.

This week’s Ask an SEO inquiry is concerning difference content, roundups, and listicles:

“The traffic from our roundups and versus difference posts has collapsed. Should we forsake this format or can we alter how we method it?”

The abbreviated answer is yes. Comparison content, roundups, and listicles can motionless be helpful for SEO, and ample tongue models (AI) are not the lone channels out there. Using them for SEO and AIO/GEO is never a fine idea. Many group bought into this “silver bullet” scheme and are paying the price. The identical goes for scaled content, and Google went following it multiple times alongside the spam updates, updating its finest practices.

Lists and comparisons are not spammy if they are done for users vs. traffic. The quality guidelines and spam updates don’t need to halt anyone from creating them; you fair need to activity alongside this category of satisfied in a astute way.

First, several definitions:

• Comparison satisfied is whenever two or additional items, brands, or services are compared.
• Roundups are a gathering of things to inspect out and satisfied to peruse or consume for the week.
• Listicles portion ideas and options.

If you’re using any of these types of satisfied to try and equivalent an algorithm, you volition get caught and endure your traffic and referrals and it is uncomplicated for the tech companies to detect trends and patterns and cognize who is on them. But, this has been covered in detail, so I’ll jump into several of the reasons to continue operating alongside and creating this category of content, but in a strategic way.

Generating Customers From Bigger Brands

If there are two, three, or five big brands in your space, and all has hunt volume, this is a aureate chance for you as a smaller business or brand. Find YouTubers that already do comparisons and position in your niche, afterward ask them to create difference videos alongside two of the big brands, alongside you added in as an alternative.

By optimizing the video for the big brands, the creator is capable to get traffic to their video. If you are a new brand, most apt you volition have constricted searches, but you are now getting visibility to the users already in the two big brands’ funnels by being included. The YouTube creator not lone places you in forefront of them, but they are an “unbiased” third-party marketing why you are capable to vie and anywhere your merchandise or assistance strikes the two big ones.

Best of all, you can do this as a media buy, an affiliate association (although much harder to get done), PR by sending merchandise out, or a hybrid deal. It’s client acquisition and getting your name on the radar during construction brand.

Bonus: This may assistance AI akin ChatGPT or Claude, and hunt engines study concerning your products and how you difference if the satisfied is consumed and trusted.

Credibility For Potential Customers

Large financial and period commitments akin hosting, SaaS systems, or a moving business necessitate significant research. We can all say we’re the best, but third-party satisfied from unbiased individuals can add rely to a person that cannot decide. Working alongside difference and catalog content, particularly websites and videos that authorize comments and reviews, allows the third gathering to build the rely for your brand in a way that a brand cannot do on its own.

Pro-tip: If your client assistance squad is inundated alongside questions concerning a particular issue, have the difference satisfied characteristic the resolution and fix to let the individual cognize you are or are not the correct choice. It can assistance to preserve prosperity on assistance from having to continually reiterate the identical item multiple times.

In the B2B and assistance space, a “best” listicle can add rely and credibility if they are a trusted publish or creator. Examples contain the U.S. News and World Report finest academy lists, the 40 under 40 lists, and locally there are publications akin Washingtonian Magazine alongside the finest doctors and another local businesses to go to. Because we rely these publications to investigation for us (even if several are affiliate now vs. non-incentivized), there is a flat of rely built in that helps a possible customer, client, or person create a decision.

Crawling And Traffic

When you’re featured in a roundup or a list, there are a few benefits that can happen:

• Spiders can crawl to your new leaf or your content, afterward prosecute internal links for crawling and indexing.
• New consumers, readers, and journalists/editors can detect you.
• You get traffic from their inner promotions.

Two industry examples are SEO Roundtable by Barry Schwartz and SEOFOMO by Aleyda Solis. Both create roundups of satisfied they or their teams hand-select and publish. They advance it to their social media channels, email lists, and another promos. At this point, group and spiders discover the content, sojourn the page, and if there is interest, click-through to your website to study more.

Once on your website the bots and spiders volition consume and measure your content, and they may try to discover additional pages that haven’t been discovered yet. Consumers volition cognition your products, content, or services and decide if they desire to opt in to your lists, shop, or add you to a preferred origin for Google Discover and search.

If you’re not in the roundup, you don’t get admission to the owner’s spectators or this opportunity. Both examples complete are proven models as their readership and subscribers keep growing. People do akin norm lists. For example, in the person earth a roundup of the finest places anywhere kids eat liberated locally or bars alongside espresso martinis on blessed hr that week could resonate.

Building An Audience

Having a roundup can build your spectators for a few reasons:

• People who rely you volition cognize the satisfied is vetted.
• Many consumers don’t desire to have to expend period sorting through what is happening, and you’re providing a quick way to know.
• The group and businesses featured inside your roundups may portion alongside their audiences.

Each of these can and do happen, but if you halt doing roundups since hunt engines and LLMs started penalizing, you’re alienating a lawful traffic and spectators acquisition channel.

Google Does Not Hate Listicles

It’s no concealed listicles create prosperity through sponsorship fees, affiliate commissions, CPM/RPM payouts, and more.

Consumers and B2B shoppers are looking for current ideas, point-of-sale (POS) systems for small businesses, and which coverage or credit cards are finest for their needs. These lists assistance them study concerning products and services they may not have known, provision an uncomplicated way to study the pros and cons of each, and assistance them create a decision. At this stage in their journey, they are prepared to create a purchase. That is why this category of satisfied converts revenue and is precious to a brand.

And no, Google does not dislike affiliate links or listicles. What hunt engines do not akin is whenever ample domains abuse their authority and create satisfied at measure to create prosperity vs. focusing on their niche and their area of expertise.

Comparison content, listicles, and roundups are motionless fine types of satisfied to produce, be included in, and to have in a marketing plan. It is a matter of using them in a way that is not meant to equivalent an algorithm, but alternatively advantage the two consumers and your business.

When you put intent and norm archetypal vs. argent bullets for rankings and AI, you’ll be capable to acquire and develop in a natural way.

More Resources:

• How To Track The ROI Of Content On A Page
• How To Build A Content Distribution System That Compounds
• Should I Optimize My Content Differently For Each Platform? – Ask An SEO

Featured Image: Paulo Bobita/Search Engine Journal

Key Takeaways

• Kelly Schultz, an ancient seller by profession, operates The Great Pumpkin Farm for concerning seven weeks a year.
• Schultz had no agriculture cognition whenever he bought the 85-acre asset for concerning $650,000 in 1993.
• Today, the ranch draws additional than 100,000 visitors all autumn alongside pumpkins, hayrides, live amusement and another attractions.

A one-day pop-up kicks off a Hello Kitty collab that hides six crowned figurines inner kids’ meal blind boxes.

Discord’s latest update released today has a big betterment for Markdown previews: they should now render correctly alternatively of alongside “a bunch of symbols,” according to the company. LLMs and AI agents frequently depend on Markdown records for instructions and context, so these improved previews could be helpful for group sharing data concerning AI projects on the platform.

“When you upload a Markdown (.md) file, you’ll now see the document rendered all nice and neat and beautiful alternatively of alongside a bunch of symbols,” Discord says. “This includes tables, formatting, all that fine stuff. Totally awesome for whenever you’re doing a informal Sunday-night sharing READMEs alongside your friends.”

Google has additionally improved its Markdown support, as it lately started letting users edit Markdown records immediately in Docs without having to change the records to the Docs format.

Discord says its new update additionally lets you arrange servers and channels by right-clicking the icon on the sidebar and using a new “Move to…” feature. Discord Nitro members are additionally now capable to upload records as ample as 1GB.

Vercel Security Checkpoint

|

sin1::1792695632-AbQ6gp8mcnxkcQWJaNp0DyNyxtkc5bOj

Follow topics and authors from this narrative to see additional akin this in your personalized homepage nourish and to obtain email updates.

• Jess Weatherbed

I’ve sat through many conversations lately concerning which incumbent application categories AI-native startups are concerning to rub out. The narrative typically goes akin this: Incumbents are bolting a chatbot onto a 10-year-old merchandise during new startups have built AI-native solutions from day one; therefore, incumbents are losing their edge.  

And yet, many incumbents are thriving in the AI era. What gives? While the age of the application stack can certainly run client relevancy, I think that’s frequently the incorrect paradigm.

At this item in my career, I’ve watched this energetic perform out throughout three innovation curves: from web to mobile, afterward to cloud, and now to AI. In each, several incumbents thrived, several decayed. Some startups redefined categories, several were side-swiped by incumbents.

In my experience, the winners frequently aren’t the ones alongside the newer stack. They’re those who stayed near adequate to the client (from their archetypal dollar of income to hitting $500M+ in ARR) to notice whenever the issue the client hired them to resolve quietly changed form — and they kept innovating about that issue set.

A applicable example

Consider a cloud-based SaaS business marketing small-business accounting application today. It built a awesome market stance by giving a endeavor owner a sole location to track transactions, dispatch invoices and, most importantly, near the books accurately. For years, that was enough.

But as the business grew and gained market share, its customers’ issue set quietly changed. The application phase had made decision the monthly books accurate, but not additional efficient. People motionless spent hours on repetitive tasks alternatively of strategic financial work. 

At that point, this example incumbent has two paths. It can decide effectiveness “isn’t what we do” and let person alternatively resolve that problem, or it can treat the change as its own issue to solve. Companies that obtain the archetypal way rarely get disrupted in one theatrical moment. It happens part by piece: A startup builds an automated income acknowledgment tool, afterward an automated forecasting tool, and so on. Eventually, customers commencement asking why they’re motionless paying for the first accounting application whenever other, higher-ROI tools are solving today’s problems.

So how do incumbents remain merchandise leaders through innovation curves?

The playbook is uncomplicated to say and harder to run

Pay near notice to the development of the problem. This appears obvious, but I’ve seen countless startups get worse as they succeed. Go-to-market optimizes the funnel, and merchandise optimizes the roadmap, but nobody, not equal the merchandise manager, owns the job of asking whether what the client hired you to do three years ago is motionless what they need today.

It’s uncomplicated to fixate on the next characteristic alternatively of asking how fine your resolution addresses the evolving problem. Though former wasn’t necessarily my power in undergrad, I’ve arrive to see the enormous value in leaders understanding the former of a customer’s problem. Where did it commencement 10 years ago? How did it develop before our solution, and how has it evolved since? How volition it alter as new innovation is adopted?

Ask this instead

The one item I’d advance you to pin complete a merchandise roadmap is this: “Stop asking customers what alternatively we can build for them.” Customers are mostly bad at answering that question, and it’s not their fault. People awareness frustration lengthy before they can depict the tool that would fix it, and if they could, they’d build the resolution themselves. Ask these questions instead:

• Why did you clasp us in the archetypal place, and how has that issue changed? 
• How has adopting our resolution changed the ache points that you experience? 
• What are we not thinking about? 
• What recurring tasks do your workforce hate?  
• What volition your division appearance akin in five years, the two group and technology? Why?

Ask consistently throughout adequate conversations, and patterns volition appear that passage your merchandise scheme to be as forward-thinking as the startups you vie with. Stop treating a characteristic pipeline as a product strategy. Both are crucial to long-term innovation, but they aren’t the identical thing.

A few tactical ways to method this:

• Pull your final 10 renewal or churn calls and hear for “still” and “but now” (“We motionless use the merchandise for X, but now we additionally need Y.”). “But now” may merge several gold.
• Ask your client achievement squad what requests never rotate into a assistance ticket since it “isn’t really what we do.” Look for patterns.
• Once a month, sit in on client calls, not to market but to comprehend how customers depict the issue in their own words, and assistance them articulate their frustrations.
• Spend a day alongside an advisory client who fits your ideal client profile. Walk through the former of the issue and the questions above. They’ll value the attention, and you’ll depart alongside genuine merchandise insight.

Build your innovation for adaptability. If you can broaden the merchandise lone by tearing up its first core, you’ll continually move too slowly. Incumbents that remain applicable build modularly adequate to assimilate an neighboring problem, akin automated income acknowledgment or forecasting capabilities, without a multi-year rebuild putting them rearward in the competition for customer retention.

Never completely let go of merchandise strategy. Great founders remain students of the customer’s evolving problem, equal following hiring a powerful VP of Product or Chief Product Officer. They’re students of the customers’ historical, current and forthcoming needs. That doesn’t undercut their Head of Product. It gives the business a fit inspect on the merchandise team’s assumptions whenever it matters most. 

By following this playbook, your business can remain innovative, applicable and forward-thinking at all phase of scale. Complacency is a competitor’s opportunity. When leaders get comfortable alongside achievement and overconfident concerning their customers’ needs, a startup downward the street starts asking the correct questions and solving today’s problems. 

After all, whenever does a startup rotate into an incumbent? In the AI era, nearly immediately.

I’ve sat through many conversations lately concerning which incumbent application categories AI-native startups are concerning to rub out. The narrative typically goes akin this: Incumbents are bolting a chatbot onto a 10-year-old merchandise during new startups have built AI-native solutions from day one; therefore, incumbents are losing their edge.  

And yet, many incumbents are thriving in the AI era. What gives? While the age of the application stack can certainly run client relevancy, I think that’s frequently the incorrect paradigm.

At this item in my career, I’ve watched this energetic perform out throughout three innovation curves: from web to mobile, afterward to cloud, and now to AI. In each, several incumbents thrived, several decayed. Some startups redefined categories, several were side-swiped by incumbents.

This a catalog of written awards granted to plant anywhere AI was used (or was suspected) as part of the penning process

AI WAS ALLOWED FROM THE START

🇯🇵 Short story Are You There? by Kamome Ashizawa — 9th Nikkei Hoshi Shinichi Literary Award, Excellence Award, 2022
Ashizawa made 101 stories in three weeks alongside AI. The narrative that won was mostly written by Ashizawa alongside a small AI; the another hundred experiments were mostly machine-generated. This was the archetypal AI-assisted narrative to win a Hoshi prize.

🇯🇵 Short story The Last Painter by Toh Katagiri — 12th Nikkei Hoshi Shinichi Literary Award, Excellence Award, 2025
The organizers classified it as AI-assisted, but never stated exactly how. A chap finalist says Katagiri told the collection that all declaration was written personally.

🇯🇵 Short story Genome Tower by Shamizui — 13th Nikkei Hoshi Shinichi Literary Award, Grand Prix, 2026
The disclosed AI use was apparently constricted to inventing the name of a fictional disease. The organizers motionless counted it among the year’s AI-assisted winners.

🇯🇵 Short story Parallel Self-Mediation Co., Ltd. by En Shijima — 13th Nikkei Hoshi Shinichi Literary Award, Excellence Award, 2026
Shijima described operating alongside AI as emotion additional akin “choosing” than “writing.” This appears akin a much additional generative collaboration than Genome Tower. The award stood.

🇯🇵 Short story Erinnerung by Rino Takinouchi — 13th Nikkei Hoshi Shinichi Literary Award, Excellence Award, 2026
ChatGPT produced first material. Takinouchi corrected confused pronouns, dated phrases, and damaged logic, afterward changed the heading and ending and added the CRISPR-Cas9 material. Of the 2026 Hoshi winners, this has the clearest community document of AI-generated prose being extensively rewritten.

The 13th Hoshi award received 2,107 entries. Organizers counted 491 as partially AI-created and stated three of the four general-division winners had used AI location in the process.

🇺🇸 Artist books The Library of Nonhuman Books by Karen Ann Donnachie and Andy Simionato — Robert Coover Award, First Place, 2020
An AI study device uses device vision, OCR, and tongue handling to discover abbreviated poetic combinations in bodily books, erase the surrounding words, brace them alongside images, and publish new volumes. One of those volumes, Perception, additionally won Australia’s Cornish Family Prize.

🇸🇰 Poetry collection Výsledky vzniku by Liza Gennart — Zlatá vlna, 2021
Zuzana Husárová and Ľubomír Panák trained GPT-2 on 2,108 Slovak works, afterward curated and lightly edited its poems. The gathering won Slovakia’s annual award for the finest first Slovak poesy book.

🇺🇸 Poetry series ReRites by David Jhave Johnston — Electronic Literature Organization Robert Coover Award, 2022
Twelve books of poesy built from neural-network output selected and edited by Johnston. The project openly calls itself “Human + A.I. poetry,” which is exactly the benevolent of item an electronic-literature award exists to recognize.

🇺🇸 Chapbook A Black Story May Contain Sensitive Content by Lillian-Yvonne Bertram — DIAGRAM/New Michigan Press Chapbook Contest, Winner, 2023
Bertram used GPT-3 and Warpland, a example trained on Gwendolyn Brooks. Three sections merge device responses to her prompts. The media knew how the publish was made and published it openly.

🇺🇸 Short story Stargazers by Ruei-Jie Chang — UCSB Mind & Machine Intelligence Writing Contest, First Prize, 2024
Chang used ChatGPT for the kernel of the narrative and Claude to arrange and translate a Mandarin-English draft, afterward revised it. The competition explicitly welcomed human-only, machine-only, and hybrid entries, and required everyone to document the process.

🇷🇺 Short story 30–70 by Yana Vagner — Valentin Kataev Literary Prize, Winner, 2025
Vagner wrote the narrative alongside Alice, Yandex’s AI assistant. It starts by showing her immediate and the AI’s response, afterward uses the scheme for recurring climate reports. The collaboration was apparent whenever the narrative won.

🇬🇧 Generative poem WORDS BEYOND WORDS by Sasha Stiles — Lumen Prize Literature & Poetry Award, 2025
A fine-tuned tongue example uses Stiles’s prompts, origin texts, and code to create a new poem whenever the activity is refreshed. The scheme itself, fairly than a sole fixed output, received the award.

🇬🇧 Interactive fiction Flesh & Blood by Chris Joseph — Electronic Literature Organization Robert Coover Award, 2026
An interactive narrative anywhere readers resolve puzzles in a disturbing earth of bodies and machinery. Joseph openly lists it among his AI-assisted works.

ORGANIZERS OR PUBLISHERS SAID AI WAS USED

🇫🇷 Novel C’était ça ou mourir by Thélyson Orélien — Prix du Roman Fnac, 2026
The novel won Fnac’s prize, afterward was removed from the Goncourt longlist following AI allegations. On October 21, Boréal dropped Orélien following an external assessment reportedly established AI markers in working-document metadata. The publishing company stated it motionless did not cognize how much AI had been used. Orélien had denied that any declaration was machine-generated.

🇸🇬 Poems Migrant Writers of Singapore poesy competition — Migrant Literature Festival, 2024
Eight winners were announced, afterward the complete catalog was recalled following organizers stated three winning entries were AI-generated. Their assessment relied partially on Scribbr and QuillBot.

🇺🇸 Poems Poetry.com November and December contests — Two Monthly First Prizes, 2024
Poetry.com stated the two first winners were created “with assistance” from AI, changed the results, and redistributed the prizes. The removed poems and writers are no longer reliably identifiable. The names on the current outcome pages are the replacements, not the accused entrants.

CONFIRMED AI USE

🇯🇵 Novel Sympathy Tower Tokyo by Rie Kudan — 170th Akutagawa Prize, 2024
Kudan archetypal guessed that concerning 5% of the novel engaged ChatGPT, afterward gave a much smaller figure: concerning one leaf out of 143. She consulted its output for the replies written by the AI inner the novel. The award stood.

🇨🇳 Short story The Land of Machine Memories by Shen Yang, penning as “QuartZen” — 5th Youth Popular Science and Science Fiction Competition, Second Prize, 2023
AI generated the title, prose, illustrations, and pen name complete 66 rounds of prompting. The coordinator welcomed Shen and hid the test from the judges. This is frequently called a national written prize, but it was a broad Jiangsu affiliation contest: 18 stories shared second award and 90 of approximately 200 entries received awards.

🇯🇵 Web novel Modest Skill “Tidying Up” Is the Strongest! — 18th AlphaPolis Fantasy Novel Awards, Grand Prize and Reader’s Choice, 2025
The author stated a ample bulk of the web novel was made alongside generative AI. AlphaPolis afterward canceled the imprint type and manga adaptation and changed its rules. Reporting confirms those cancellations, but not that the two award labels were formally revoked.

🇺🇸 Memoir How to Win One Million Dollars and $#!T Glitter! by Luke Stoffel — IBPA Book Award, Benjamin Franklin Silver Medal for Neurodivergent Communities, 2026
Stoffel says he used ChatGPT for grammar and structural scaffolding and disclosed it in the publish and award submission. IBPA’s guidelines did not prohibit AI-assisted work, and the publish received Silver. IBPA has not publically commented on his AI use.

SUSPECTED OR DISPUTED

🇿🇼 Short story The Blue Fighter by Simbarashe Steyn Kundizeza — Caine Prize for African Writing, Winner, 2026
Pangram flagged nearly the complete narrative as AI-generated, according to The Atlantic. Kundizeza denied using AI and stated the narrative drew on his family’s experiences. The award opened a review. No final finding or revocation had been announced as of October 21.

🇬🇧 Short story The Serpent in the Grove by Jamir Nazir — Commonwealth Short Story Prize, Overall Winner, 2026
Pangram called it 100% AI-generated. Nazir denied it and described six or seven drafts made alongside Android speech-to-text since of a chronic condition. The Commonwealth Foundation reviewed drafts, timestamps, notes, and testimony, accepted his account, and kept the award. The allegation is disputed, not proven.

🇬🇧 Short story The Bastion’s Shadow by John Edward DeMicoli — Commonwealth Short Story Prize, Canada and Europe Winner, 2026
Pangram additionally returned 100% here. DeMicoli produced handwritten drafts, notes, and years of investigation and denied using AI. The Foundation accepted the evidence and the award stood.

🇬🇧 Short story Mehendi Nights by Sharon Aruparayil — Commonwealth Short Story Prize, Asia Winner, 2026
Aruparayil denied using AI at any phase and kept a document trail. She additionally established that adding three Marathi words and removing one term made a flagged division enroll as 100% human. The Foundation kept the award.

🇬🇧 Short story Descend by Chanel Sutherland — Commonwealth Short Story Prize, Overall Winner, 2025
Pangram scanned the narrative a twelvemonth afterward and tagged it 88% AI-generated. Sutherland denied using AI and stated its repeat and beat arrive from Vincentian oral storytelling. Her publishing company and delegate backed her. No community provenance assessment of the 2025 narrative has been released.

🇬🇧 Short story Back and Forth by Kavyta Kay — Harper’s Bazaar UK Short Story Competition, Winner, 2026
A screenshot of a 100% Pangram outcome dispersed online. No author response, coordinator investigation, admission, or revocation has surfaced.

🇬🇧 Poem + unknown Peter Doolan and an unnamed winner — Plaza Prizes, 2025
The Plaza disqualified the two following detector flags during admitting it could not cognize how much AI had been used, “if any.” Both denied it. Doolan stated his poem had already been published in 2018. This looks small akin an AI controversy than a detector-driven procedural failure.

NOMINATIONS AND SHORTLISTS WITHDRAWN

🇺🇸 Comics anthology Stardust the Super Wizard Anthology — Eisner Award for Best Anthology, Nominee, 2026
One leaf was an AI-generated humorous credited to the invented “Alex Irons.” The publishing company and another contributors reportedly did not know. After Comic-Con stated the judges would not have nominated it had they known, the publishing company withdrew the anthology from the ballot.

🇧🇷 Illustrated edition Frankenstein, Clube de Literatura Clássica edition — Prêmio Jabuti Illustration Category, Finalist, 2023
The publish openly credited decorator Vicente Pessôa and Midjourney and was marketed as completely AI-illustrated. Two judges stated they did not acknowledge Midjourney was AI. The type was disqualified under rules that had never anticipated generative art.

🇬🇧 Illustrated book Unnamed illustrated title — Ink Book Prize, Shortlisted, 2026
The award removed one heading following complaints concerning AI in its illustrations. A distinct shortlistee withdrew in protest. Comparing the old and new lists suggests imaginable titles, but neither the organizers nor the reporting named the accused book, so I won’t either.

NEAR-MISSES AND ELIGIBILITY CASES

🇳🇿 Novellas + stories Angel Train and Obligate Carnivore by Elizabeth Smither and Stephanie Johnson — Ockham New Zealand Book Awards, 2026
Both books were initially barred since their publishing company used AI-generated covers, afterward reinstated following the awards rely decided the regulation had arrived too late. Neither reached the longlist.

🇯🇵 Short story Cage of Algorithms by Keiji Aono — 12th Nikkei Hoshi Shinichi Literary Award, Finalist, 2025
Aono says approximately 80% was AI-generated and 20% human-revised. It reached the final ten out of 1,250 entries but did not win.

🇯🇵 Short story The Day a Computer Writes a Novel — 3rd Nikkei Hoshi Shinichi Literary Award, First Round, 2016
Humans supplied the plot, characters, and tongue components; application assembled the prose. It passed the archetypal screening but did not win. The rules explicitly allowed nonhuman entrants, making this a pre-LLM precursor fairly than a deception.

◉

[Submitted on 19 Oct 2026]

Authors:P. K. G. Williams (Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian)

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The specialized writings can be viewed as an "information commons:" an intangible asset that "no one owns and is shared by everyone." There are well-established financial and governmental frameworks for understanding specified commons, emerging from the former of agriculture average lands established in places akin preindustrial England. This part provides a primer on the former and these frameworks, and considers a key difference between the data commons and the sectors of yore: during data commons are sturdy and immensely precious --- several can be stated to position among humanity's top achievements --- the English agriculture commons no longer meaningfully exist. The second are gone not since of the well-known "tragedy of the commons," but fairly a event known as the chamber movement (~1600--1800) that transformed the average lands into personal property. Many observers, afterward and now, fairness chamber to have been theft at a social scale. This part argues that synthetic intellect (AI) provides exactly the tools needed to allow a previously-infeasible chamber of the data commons. Although AI-enabled chamber does not run identically to bodily enclosure, it shares the key features of turning the commons into personal prosperity and undermining the social systems that assistance them (via "slop spam"). The concepts presented in this part can provision a scholarly basis for interrogating the foreboding emotion that AI may portray not fair a smash-and-grab, but an assault upon a entire way of life.

Submission history

From: Peter Williams [view email]
[v1] Mon, 19 Oct 2026 20:22:54 UTC (110 KB)

Follow topics and authors from this narrative to see additional akin this in your personalized homepage nourish and to obtain email updates.

• Ellen Thomas

Biograph, the world’s most advanced preventive health and diagnostics clinic, today announced the completion of its archetypal U.S. study using Caristo Diagnostics’ CaRi-Heart® innovation evaluating AI-powered coronary inflammation finding in asymptomatic, low-risk individuals. The investigation revealed that coronary inflammation is general among asymptomatic adults without known bosom sickness – and is undetected by norm lifeblood tests and another traditional cardiovascular hazard factors.

The study, accessible to clinically eligible Biograph Black tier members, blended Biograph’s advanced diagnostics – including high-resolution coronary computed tomography angiography  (CCTA) imaging and cardiometabolic profiling – alongside Caristo’s CaRi-Heart and CaRi-Plaque® technologies*. This collaborative methodology enabled researchers to measure the prevalence of coronary inflammation using the AI-enabled CaRi-Heart innovation to decide cardiovascular hazard in individuals who may alternatively appear low hazard through traditional screening.

The study established that coronary inflammation is average (42.9%) in asymptomatic, low-risk adults and frequently occurs without any plaque buildup or blockage. Specifically, 42.9% of participants exhibited elevated inflammation alongside 17.9% of participants exhibiting extremely elevated inflammation in at smallest one important bosom artery. The results additionally propose a possible limitation in norm assessment: About 47% of participants alongside no detectable coronary plaque exhibited elevated coronary perivascular inflammation. By evaluating coronary inflammation alongside traditional imaging appraisal of plaque burden and stenosis, we get a additional complete image of cardiovascular risk..

Importantly, regular bloodwork and medicinal tools – including cholesterin markers (ApoB, non-HDL-C), lifeblood sugar (HbA1c), systemic inflammation (hs-CRP), and a extensively used cardiovascular hazard calculator (AHA PREVENT-ASCVD) – showed no association alongside the existence of coronary inflammation and unsuccessful to acknowledge which patients had inflamed arteries. These results fortify Biograph’s center philosophy: standalone bloodwork and secluded metrics do not inform the complete story.  By immediately analyzing the existence discipline of the tissue surrounding the coronary arteries, this non-invasive AI innovation uncovers possible cardiovascular hazard years before the onset of irreversible bosom disease.