Product Pages Get 24% Of AI Citations, Reddit & YouTube 4%

Sep 04, 2026 02:00 AM - 1 hour ago 2

If you’ve spent immoderate clip connected a GEO aliases AEO Slack transmission this year, you’ve heard the aforesaid proposal connected loop. Be connected Reddit. Be connected YouTube. Meet buyers wherever the organization already trusts. That proposal is not incorrect for a purchaser who is still learning what a class moreover is. It conscionable is not what the information shows erstwhile that aforesaid purchaser starts comparing named vendors alternatively of browsing the topic. Before I put that uncovering successful beforehand of you, I sent the institution down it six pointed questions astir really it built the study.

What Was Actually Tracked

The study, written up by Ten Speed’s Nelson Brassell, pulled citation information from Peec AI, a instrumentality that monitors really ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini mention URLs successful their responses. Ten Speed wrote 170 prompts designed to reflector really a purchaser talks to an AI adjunct erstwhile they’ve moved past “what is simply a CRM” and into “Pipedrive vs. HubSpot for sales-led companies” aliases “how does X grip SOC 2 reporting.” Those prompts ran crossed Ten Speed’s ain customer base, spanning fintech, beingness security, hospitality, and IT automation, positive look-alike competitors truthful the results wouldn’t conscionable bespeak the agency’s ain clients. That produced 7,387 full citation appearances.

Product pages led astatine 24.1% of each citations, the azygous largest category. Articles, meaning blog posts, news, and PR, took different 17.4%. Comparison pages and listicles each landed astir 13%, how-to guides conscionable nether 9%, and homepages a astonishing 7.8%. Directory profiles connected sites for illustration G2 and Capterra picked up 7.2%. Reddit, YouTube, forums, and chat threads mixed for 4.2%, pinch Reddit doing astir of that work, and YouTube hardly showing up astatine astir 1%. Add it up, and brand-controllable contented (the pages a trading squad writes and owns) accounted for 88.3% of everything the AI models cited erstwhile buyers were deciding.

Comparison contented punched good supra its weight. Comparison format prompts made up 20% of the punctual group but generated adjacent to 27% of the citations, a 1.33 times return that astir B2B contented teams are leaving connected the array because they dainty “X vs. Y” pages arsenic a protect afterthought alternatively than a existent citation surface.

See also: ChatGPT Often Retrieves But Rarely Cites Reddit Pages, Data Shows

6 Questions, And What Changed Because I Asked Them

The published type of the punctual breakdown array said 220 full prompts, while each different floor plan successful the portion utilized 170 arsenic the denominator. That is not a rounding quirk; it changes each percent successful the study depending connected which number you use. Ten Speed confirmed 170 is the correct fig and told maine the mislabeled ocular would beryllium corrected. A related inconsistency, wherever the “comparison” class was tagged 2 different ways successful 2 different charts, sewage reconciled to the aforesaid 34 punctual count erstwhile I asked which method really supported the header comparison stat.

I besides asked really galore chopped customer brands and verticals beryllium down those 7,387 citations, because that is the existent sample size question, not the citation count. Ten Speed declined to springiness moreover a range, connected the grounds that combining a customer count pinch the named verticals would consequence re-identifying a small, confidential customer base. I’ll return that arsenic a morganatic bound alternatively than a dodge, but it besides intends extracurricular researchers can’t independently judge really wide the underlying sample really is.

Two different answers matter much than the first two. Ten Speed’s own piece names the deficiency of a per-platform breakdown arsenic its biggest unfastened question, since ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini almost surely don’t behave the aforesaid measurement astatine the bottommost of the funnel. When I asked directly, the reply was that the platform-level information simply wasn’t collected successful this pull. And erstwhile I asked whether the 4% versus 24% split, the number the full header rests on, had been statistically tested aliases conscionable reported arsenic a descriptive pattern, the reply was plain. It was descriptive only. The study does usage nonparametric tests elsewhere for citation complaint comparisons crossed page types, but not for the circumstantial divided that makes the pitch.

That is the item that changes really I’d usage this data. A study whose squad admits a information spread alternatively of glossing complete it earns much of my trust, not less, but a descriptive 88/four divided averaged crossed 4 AI models pinch very different citation behaviour is simply a snapshot of 1 customer guidelines astatine 1 moment, not a rule of really B2B buyers usage AI. Ten Speed didn’t effort to dress a directional uncovering up arsenic an manufacture benchmark erstwhile I pushed connected it, and that restraint is rarer than it should be.

Ten Speed is upfront astir the remainder of what this isn’t. The dataset only covers its ain B2B SaaS and master services clients, truthful user aliases ecommerce brands could spot thing different entirely. It’s a azygous point-in-time pull, not a tracked trend, and citation volume is not the aforesaid point arsenic a click, a demo request, aliases a closed deal. Ten Speed said plainly that it doesn’t person the information yet to link these citations to pipeline, and I’d dainty that arsenic the honorable reply alternatively than a hedge.

See also: AI Visibility Rankings Aren’t Stable – New Research Shows It’s Mostly Statistical Noise

What This Means For Your Content Plan

None of this intends the Reddit and YouTube proposal is worthless. It intends it’s aimed astatine the incorrect shape of the funnel. Ten Speed’s ain information suggests community content whitethorn still transportation weight earlier, erstwhile a purchaser is still forming an sentiment astir a class alternatively than choosing betwixt named vendors. What changes is wherever you put your adjacent 4th of contented fund if the extremity is showing up erstwhile personification is really astir to buy.

Rewrite your merchandise pages and homepage for illustration an AI exemplary is reference them cold. Product pages and homepages together relationship for adjacent to a 3rd of citations astatine the evaluation stage, and some activity by answering “what does this do, who is it for, what does it merge with” successful plain language. Clever positioning gives the exemplary little to activity pinch than a flat, circumstantial explanation does.

Build comparison contented earlier, and against much than your 2 evident rivals. A 1.33 times return connected comparison format prompts is not a marginal edge. If your comparison pages only beryllium because income asked for a battlecard against 1 competitor, you’re underinvesting successful the format that’s already outperforming its stock of purchaser questions.

Manage your G2 and Capterra profiles arsenic content, not conscionable arsenic reappraisal inboxes. At 7.2% of citations, directory floor plan copy, class tags, and integration lists are structured data the models thin connected erstwhile a purchaser asks for options successful your category. A old aliases miscategorized floor plan misinforms the exemplary astatine precisely the infinitesimal it’s building someone’s shortlist.

I’d adhd a 4th measurement that isn’t successful Ten Speed’s report, because it’s the 1 I effort to practice. Before you repetition immoderate AI visibility statistic successful a customer platform aliases a contented strategy doc, inquire the aforesaid questions I asked here. What’s the existent denominator? Is this an mean crossed platforms that mightiness beryllium hiding 1 outlier? Was the header number really tested, aliases conscionable described? Every AI citation study published this year, including ones I’ve cited successful this column, should past that benignant of pushback earlier it shapes a budget.

I’ve spent complete 2 decades telling clients and readers not to build a strategy astir a azygous study, and this 1 doesn’t alteration that advice. It confirms it. A study that survives six annoying emails and a corrected floor plan is worthy much to a moving SEO than 1 that only survives a property release.

More Resources: