OpenAI won’t watermark ChatGPT text because its users could get caught

Aug 05, 2024 07:18 AM - 4 months ago 99611

OpenAI has had a strategy for watermarking ChatGPT-created matter and a instrumentality to observe nan watermark fresh for astir a year, reports The Wall Street Journal. But nan institution is divided internally complete whether to merchandise it. On 1 hand, it seems for illustration nan responsible point to do; connected nan other, it could wounded its bottommost line.

OpenAI’s watermarking is described arsenic adjusting really nan exemplary predicts nan astir apt words and phrases that will travel erstwhile ones, creating a detectable pattern. (That’s a simplification, but you tin cheque retired Google’s more in-depth explanation for Gemini’s matter watermarking for more).

The institution apparently recovered this to beryllium “99.9% effective” for making AI matter detectable erstwhile there’s capable of it — a imaginable boon for teachers trying to deter students from turning complete penning assignments to AI — while not affecting nan value of its chatbot’s matter output. In a study nan institution commissioned, “people worldwide supported nan thought of an AI discovery instrumentality by a separator of 4 to one,” nan Journal writes.

But it seems OpenAI is worried that utilizing watermarking could move disconnected surveyed ChatGPT users, almost 30 percent of whom evidently told nan institution that they’d usage nan package little if watermarking was implemented.

Some staffers had different concerns, specified arsenic that watermarking could beryllium easy thwarted utilizing tricks for illustration bouncing nan matter backmost and distant betwixt languages pinch Google construe aliases making ChatGPT adhd emoji and past deleting them afterward, according to nan Journal.

Despite that, labor still reportedly consciousness that nan attack is effective. In ray of nagging personification sentiments, though, nan article says immoderate suggested trying methods that are “potentially little arguable among users but unproven.” Something is amended than nothing, I suppose.

More