Of Gods and Languages: On "When God Spoke Greek" (2013)

WHAT really is the Bible? The mobility is harder to reply than it first seems.

These days the Christian Bible is usually regarded arsenic the Greek New Testament added to the Old Testament, which is simply a reordering of the Hebrew Bible. If we publication the Bible successful English, we do truthful successful the assurance that the first portion is soundly translated from the Hebrew and the 2nd from the Greek. Catholics see immoderate Jewish Apocrypha, those Scriptures without Hebrew originals (and respective astir apt composed successful Greek anyway), while Protestants cull them. Most Christians are unaware that, successful the early Church, the Bible was Greek: not only the New Testament but besides the Old Testament. This Greek type of the Old Testament is known arsenic the Septuagint. And for the early Church it was not simply a translator of the Old Testament, 1 that could possibly beryllium improved; rather, it was a revelation of God’s word. What the Septuagint was and is, and really the Greek Bible changed to go a Hebrew and Greek Bible, is the communicative that Timothy Michael Law tells. It is simply a gripping tale, beautifully told, and should beryllium of profound liking to immoderate scholar of the Jewish aliases Christian Bible. Why? Because, arsenic Law shows us, the Septuagint preserves older versions of parts of the Hebrew Scriptures, immoderate going backmost agelong earlier the canon of the Hebrew Bible was settled.

The Latin connection septuaginta intends “seventy,” and we inherit it arsenic a sanction for the Greek Old Testament from Josephus (c. 37–c. 100 CE), who utilized it successful his writings, and who talks astir its statement successful his Antiquities of the Jews, which Cassiodorus translated into Latin. Josephus draws connected the Letter of Aristeas, which presents itself arsenic written by a Greek pagan successful the 3rd period BCE. We publication location of really King Ptolemy II (Philadelphus) of Egypt invites 72 Jewish scholars, six from each tribe, to the cosmopolitan metropolis of Alexandria to construe the first 5 books of the Hebrew Scriptures (the Torah) into Greek truthful that they whitethorn beryllium housed successful the awesome library. In return, he will merchandise a awesome galore Jewish slaves. So scholars travel to Egypt, are taken to a adjacent island, and construe each of the Torah successful 72 days. The Jewish organization of Alexandria approves the translation, arsenic does Philadelphus, and the matter is duly placed successful the room pinch patient instructions that it is not to beryllium revised. Modern scholars thin to work together that a Jew, not a pagan, wrote the Letter of Aristeas successful the 2nd period BCE, astir apt successful bid to bolster the image of Jewish contented and to promote loyalty to the Ptolemaic reign among diaspora Jews. With Josephus the number of translators is trimmed from 72 to 70: hence the connection “Septuagint,” abbreviated to LXX.

So the LXX originates arsenic a translator of the Torah successful Alexandria successful the early- to mid-third period BCE. Thereafter, different Hebrew Scriptures are rendered into Greek, though precisely erstwhile and why remains uncertain. The historical, prophetic, and contented books were astir apt each translated during the 2nd period BCE, successful Egypt aliases Palestine, aliases successful some places. The Septuagint was a activity successful progress, then, for a agelong time, and we should beryllium observant not to deliberation of it arsenic a single, settled canon of the Hebrew Bible arsenic translated by diaspora Jews and past reordered and utilized by Christians. In the first hundreds of years of the Common Era the canon of the Bible, Jewish and Christian alike, was not fixed; it had Scriptures that were mostly shared, others that immoderate communities included, and others excluded; moreover, the Scriptures were not ever arranged successful the aforesaid way.

We do good to retrieve that “scripture” and “canon” are different things, and of people we should ne'er make the correction of reasoning that early Christians had Bibles for illustration our own. We person to hold for the printing property to beryllium invented successful the 15th period earlier we get specified Bibles. And we request besides to support successful mind that moreover coming not each Jews and each Christians person the aforesaid canon. Ethiopian Jews and Rabbinic Jews person different canons. The aforesaid goes for the Christian churches: Protestant and Catholic Bibles differ, arsenic already noted, and the Ethiopian Orthodox Church treats I Enoch and Jubilees arsenic canonical, which seems to person been the believe besides astatine Qumran (where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found), if 1 tin talk of a biblical canon there.

We cannot grasp why the LXX, an bonzer labour of translation, appeared unless we intelligibly admit it arsenic a merchandise of the Hellenistic Age, which runs astir from 330 BCE, erstwhile Alexander the Great defeated the Persian king, Darius III, to 30 BCE, erstwhile Octavian won the conflict of Actium, marking the opening of the Roman Empire. With the triumph of Alexander came the triumph of Greek civilization and the Greek language. Both had already made monolithic inroads into the Middle East aft the conflict of Thermopylae successful the 5th period BCE, but Alexander’s spectacular conquests group the shape for the world arsenic encountered by Europe. This was a world that stretched from bluish Africa to southwest Asia; it utilized Greek currency, traded successful Greek goods, followed Greek architectural styles, publication Greek history and literature, and said a communal Greek (Koine). Common Greek is the connection of the LXX, and besides of the New Testament. It was spoken wide successful the Holy Land erstwhile Jesus was alive, and doubtless Jesus said it (along pinch a spot of Latin) erstwhile he needed to do so, alongside his regular language, Aramaic. When the Gospels were written, and erstwhile Paul and the different New Testament writers composed their letters, they quoted the LXX, not the Hebrew Bible.

This dependence connected the LXX should not astonishment us: Jews and the fledgling Christian communities regarded it arsenic an authentic revelation of God’s word. It was the age, arsenic Law writes, “when God said Greek.” But is the LXX nary much than a translator of the Hebrew Scriptures truthful thing is lost, and possibly overmuch is gained, if we guidelines our Bibles connected translations of those ineffable texts? To beryllium sure, the clip came erstwhile the LXX was compared pinch the Hebrew matter of Scripture, first by Origen, that mighty third-century theologian of Alexandria, and past by Jerome, who sought to retranslate the Christian Bible from Hebrew and Greek into Latin, thereby giving america the ground of the Vulgate, the Bible that underlies Catholic teachings. Hebrew was only the basis of the Old Testament Vulgate, though: Jerome relied connected various Greek renditions of the Hebrew Scriptures, and it tin beryllium difficult to find really nonstop his translations from the Hebrew to the Latin really are.

Not everyone agreed pinch Jerome that the Church needed a caller translator of the Scriptures. Augustine, for one, astatine first objected successful nary uncertain position that the LXX was an authentic revelation; it was the Church’s Bible, and had been for centuries. Besides, Jerome’s grasp of Hebrew would not suffice for the monolithic occupation successful hand, and a caller translator would disagreement Christendom. Yet Jerome had his way: the Vulgate replaced the Vetus Latina, the aged Latin Bible, which had been translated from the LXX. Christian literate sensibilities, particularly successful Rome, required that it beryllium done: the Vetus Latina made knowledgeable Roman Christians cringe because of its uneven and sometimes barbarous style. Yet thing was mislaid erstwhile the Vulgate displaced the LXX. Scholars person ever known that successful places the LXX could beryllium utilized to correct corrupted texts successful the Hebrew: Samuel is simply a premier case. Today, though, we person go acutely alert that the LXX is important for much than correcting corrupted bits of the Bible.

When the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered successful 1947 we abruptly had earlier america manuscripts of parts of the Hebrew Bible that were acold older than thing we had ever seen. Before the mediate of the past century, biblical scholars had mostly to contented themselves pinch the Leningrad Codex, the oldest complete type of the Hebrew Scriptures, which dates to the 11th century. There is small uncertainty that this manuscript, on pinch the little complete Aleppo Codex (the 10th century), faithfully preserves the Scriptures complete hundreds of years of rabbinic and medieval copying. Yet erstwhile it was recognized that the Dead Sea Scrolls recorded Hebrew Scriptures that differed from those successful the received Hebrew Bible thing startling came to light. The older manuscripts tended to work together pinch the LXX, and a conclusion was unavoidable: the Hebrew Scriptures successful the received Bible are successful places revisions of earlier texts. If 1 wishes to speak of divine revelation, past location is bully logic to conceive of the received Hebrew Bible arsenic 1 type of revelation among others; the LXX captures bits and pieces of that earlier revelation.

How important are these differences? More particularly, are location scriptural grounds for changing wide held theological judgments successful Christianity? Not each scholars of the LXX deliberation on the aforesaid lines. Anneli Aejmelaeus, for one, maintains that the received Hebrew Bible and the LXX stock a communal theological vision. This whitethorn good beryllium truthful if 1 steps backmost sufficiently acold from the biblical text. Yet if 1 moves successful rather adjacent astatine definite points, the chances are that immoderate Christians will beryllium made uneasy. Think for illustration of Paul’s missive to the Romans, possibly the astir important matter for galore Protestants successful the full Bible. Paul draws connected the LXX, not the Hebrew Bible, which he was perfectly tin of doing. For example, successful Romans 9:25-26 Paul draws connected Hosea 1:10 and 2:23, and prefers the Greek to the Hebrew precisely because it allows him to widen God’s committedness that Israel will prosper to see the Gentiles. It is 1 lawsuit among many. The LXX allows Paul successful his mature theology to create his position that God’s redeeming scheme includes each quality beings, not conscionable the Jews. If we return Paul to beryllium divinely inspired, we would spot the Holy Spirit is directing him to the LXX. And what does that mean for our reasoning astir the canonical shape of the Scriptures?

Timothy Michael Law does not deliberation the LXX and the received Hebrew Bible stock a communal theological vision. He gives the illustration of Exodus 15:3. The Hebrew is translated into English arsenic “The Lord is simply a warrior, the Lord is his name” (NSRV) yet erstwhile we render the LXX into English we person “The Lord, erstwhile he shatters wars, the Lord is his name.” The original translator does not wish america to spot God arsenic a warrior but arsenic a peacemaker. Similarly, successful Psalm 9:21 the Hebrew, erstwhile put into English, reads, “Put them successful fear, O Lord; fto the nations cognize that they are only human” (NSRV) whereas the LXX has “Set a lawgiver complete them, O Lord; fto the nations cognize that they are quality beings.” Here God brings rule to the nations, not conscionable fear. Not that the LXX promotes a azygous theology of bid and justice: elsewhere 1 perceive a bully woody astir God smiting those who do not please him.

Studies of the LXX person not been taken up extracurricular seminaries and universities; indeed, they person not achieved prominence moreover successful those institutions. The powerfulness of Jerome’s committedness to the authority of the Hebrew matter of the Jewish Scriptures reverberates done the hundreds of years and is seldom challenged. Yet Septuagint Studies are good placed to statesman gaining attraction wrong the academy and extracurricular it. With the New English Translation of the Septuagint (NETS), published successful 2007 and corrected successful 2009, we person a reliable matter successful English. It is simply a scholarly edition, to beryllium sure, yet now those group who publication the Scriptures pinch their eyes and ears unfastened tin do truthful pinch the Bible and the LXX some earlier them. There are respective good studies of the LXX, though they are composed chiefly pinch scholars successful mind. Timothy Michael Law has written the first preamble to the LXX that tin beryllium publication by group extracurricular the guild. It is simply a singular book, afloat of fascinating item that I cannot evoke successful a short review, a book that tells a rich | communicative that nary scholar of the Bible tin spend to ignore.

¤

LARB Staff Recommendations

• A Never-Ending Quest

  Kevin HartAug 11, 2013

• Marx, Che, Jesus

  Andrei CodrescuAug 11, 2013