Google recovered itself pressed by Judge Amit Mehta astir whether their monopoly position successful Search enabled them to return patient contented and usage it for AI answers. The speech happened connected Tuesday successful a proceeding to find whether to assistance Google’s petition to disregard Penske Media’s antitrust suit complete Google’s AI Overview feature.
Judge Mehta is the aforesaid judge that antecedently recovered Google to person an forbidden monopoly successful Search. The Tuesday proceeding centered connected whether that monopoly uncovering gives Penske a viable claim. Penske alleges that Google is utilizing it’s monopoly position to unit publishers to make their contented disposable to Google for AI training and answers.
Jason Kint, CEO of Digital Content Next (DCN), a waste and acquisition relation that represents integer contented creators, attended the proceeding and elaborate what happened successful a bid of tweets.
What Google Argued
According to Kint, Google’s attorneys explained that AI Overviews is simply a “product improvement” and described the accepted statement successful which publishers fto Google crawl their contented successful speech for hunt postulation arsenic a “vague humanities people of dealing.”
Google’s written filings successful the lawsuit person based on that AI Overviews is not a abstracted merchandise from hunt and that publishers tin ever opt retired of indexing, arguing that Penske’s claims are a request for Google to extremity the earthy improvement of search.
According to Kint, the Judge Mehta didn’t look receptive to the measurement Google saw it.
Kint tweeted:
“Google attorneys many times characterized AI Overviews arsenic a “product improvement” and called the historical traffic-for-crawling bargain pinch publishers a “vague humanities people of dealing.”!!! GTFO. Mehta pushed back: the business “all seems really unfair.””
He further explained:
“Mehta noted publishers deficiency power complete really Google uses their contented and described Google’s “product improvement” arsenic being built “on the backs of the publishers.” Importantly, he said merchandise improvements “are not immune from antitrust scrutiny.””
Google’s Use Of Publisher Content
The judge noted that different AI companies are paying for contented whereas Google is utilizing their hunt monopoly to ingest each of the net and not salary a azygous dime for it. This was very absorbing because it gives an thought of wherever the judge was leaning.
Kint tweeted:
“Mehta besides observed that a marketplace is intelligibly forming for GenAI inputs. Penske pointed to OpenAI and Perplexity arsenic G competitors paying for contented while arguing Google uses its hunt monopoly to get the aforesaid inputs astatine zero – raising rivals’ costs and barriers to entry. 4/5”
Why Publishers Can’t Say No To Google
Google truthfully insists that publishers tin opt retired of giving their contented to Google for AI training. They tin now besides opt retired of AI Mode and AI Overviews. But if Google only shows AI Overviews past that intends a patient whitethorn suffer retired of immoderate crumbs of postulation AIO sends, which is acold little than the 10 bluish links sent.
Not Looking Good For Google
The proceeding is 1 information successful a lawsuit that has been ongoing since September 2025. Mehta has not yet ruled connected the mobility to dismiss. His questions and comments astatine Tuesday’s proceeding bespeak that he whitethorn beryllium considering whether the aforesaid monopoly powerfulness identified successful the 2024 United States v. Google antitrust lawsuit whitethorn besides beryllium astatine play successful really Google tin usage that power to dictate the unfavorable publisher/Search narration terms.
Featured Image by Shutterstock/beast01
English (US) · 
Indonesian (ID) · 
