Epic Games v. Apple: the fight for the future of the App Store

Apple, the astir valuable institution successful the world, will person to activity this play to meet a ineligible deadline connected Monday. That’s aft Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson connected Friday denied the company’s petition for much clip to nutrient 1.3 cardinal documents related to App Store changes it made successful January to comply pinch a 2021 tribunal order.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who presided complete the Epic suit that resulted successful those changes, told Apple’s ineligible squad connected May 31st it would request to nutrient each documents related to really it decided the caller App Store rules aft Epic challenged them. Document find was past referred to Hixson, who quoted portion of a transcript from the proceeding erstwhile he group Monday’s deadline back successful August:

Read Article >

Epic Games isn’t done pinch Apple. A 2021 ruling forced Apple to let developers of App Store apps to nexus to extracurricular payments, and Epic has now revenge a mobility asking Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to enforce her original order.

Epic says Apple’s updated developer policy that still reserves 27 percent of extracurricular payments (or 12 percent for mini developers) for Apple itself is still unjustified. Epic argues these fees are “essentially the same” arsenic those the institution charges for utilizing its payments system.

Read Article >

Epic’s plans to release its ain third-party app shop connected iOS successful the EU could beryllium successful problem aft Apple terminated the developer relationship it planned to use. In a blog station published today, the institution shared a missive sent by Apple’s lawyers, which called Epic “verifiably untrustworthy” and said Apple does not judge that Epic will comply pinch its contractual commitments nether its developer agreement.

“Please beryllium advised that Apple has, effective immediately, terminated the Developer Program rank of Epic Games Sweden AB,” the missive — which is dated March 2nd — states. It cites Apple’s “contractual right” to terminate its Developer Program License Agreement pinch the institution astatine “Apple’s sole discretion.”

Read Article >

Epic is not pleased pinch really Apple has responded to tribunal orders. It thinks Apple’s caller 27 percent taxation connected developers that nexus to non-Apple costs methods defies a tribunal bid to fto developers supply those links and yesterday notified the tribunal that it plans to laic retired precisely how.

To refresh, District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ordered Apple successful 2021 to fto developers nexus to extracurricular costs methods, and it immediately appealed (despite having called it a “resounding victory”). Apple’s last entreaty of the tribunal bid was denied earlier this month, and the institution was forced to alteration its tune connected in-app payments. But it hardly did truthful — the 27 percent committee isn’t overmuch little than Apple’s 30 percent in-app payments fee, while different requirements for allowing extracurricular costs links are truthful onerous that developers whitethorn not want to do so. For instance, developers will person to create transaction reports for Apple each 15 days truthful the institution tin make judge it’s getting its money.

Read Article >

Almost 3 years aft the Epic v. Apple trial reached its conclusion, Apple is yet pursuing a tribunal bid to fto app developers nexus to extracurricular costs methods. But its solution is being met pinch backlash.

Apple is giving developers the greenish ray to nonstop app users extracurricular the built-in iOS costs strategy for the first time, pursuing the instructions of a California tribunal ruling successful 2021. Under the position of the injunction, Apple can’t forestall developers from including links, buttons, and different calls to action that nonstop users to extracurricular costs methods. In a filing outlining the changes, Apple says it has “fully complied” pinch the bid — but has it really?

Read Article >

Apple has updated its App Store policies to spell retired really developers tin nexus to extracurricular costs platforms, as reported by 9to5Mac. Developers will still beryllium Apple a trim if they usage an extracurricular costs platform. Apple will return a 27 percent trim (as opposed to the 30 percent successful galore cases) aliases 12 percent if a developer is portion of the App Store Small Business Program, according to a support page about outer acquisition links.

Section 3.1.1(a) of the App Store Review Guidelines lays down much of the caller rules for developers who want to nexus to replacement costs methods, for illustration really they person to use for an “entitlement” to alteration them. Developers besides can’t exclusively person payments from extracurricular Apple’s walled garden; they’ll besides person to connection Apple’s in-app acquisition strategy successful their apps.

Read Article >

The Supreme Court has denied a petition to perceive an antitrust conflict betwixt Apple and Fortnite patient Epic Games. It rejected 2 petitions, 1 from each company, this greeting — leaving the lawsuit largely, but not entirely, a triumph for Apple.

Epic v. Apple began successful 2020 aft Epic implemented its ain costs strategy for Fortnite’s virtual currency, bypassing Apple’s committee connected in-app purchases. Apple banned Epic from its iOS App Store and Epic revenge a suit successful response, claiming the App Store — and Apple’s wide walled-garden attack to iOS — violated US antitrust laws. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers rejected astir of Apple’s claims and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals largely affirmed the decision.

Read Article >

After years of back-and-forth battling between Fortnite patient Epic Games and Apple, the gaming institution filed a writ of certiorari asking the US Supreme Court to reappraisal a little tribunal ruling successful their antitrust case. Epic has based on that Apple unfairly monopolizes the mobile app abstraction pinch iOS and its in-app purchasing system, thereby making billions connected commissions.

Epic is asking the Supreme Court to reappraisal its lawsuit by measurement of clarifying points of antitrust rule that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals relied connected successful making its ruling successful April. On Thursday, Reuters reported Apple has revenge an argument (PDF) asking the Supreme Court to propulsion retired the bid from the little courts that requires changes to its App Store rules.

Read Article >

The Supreme Court has rejected Fortnite publisher Epic’s petition to make Apple loosen its App Store rules arsenic a ineligible conflict progresses. As first reported by Bloomberg and Reuters, Justice Elena Kagan declined to vacate a enactment connected a little tribunal bid astir Apple’s anti-steering rules, which limit really iOS app developers tin nonstop users to alternate costs methods. Kagan did not rumor an mentation for the decision, but Epic’s petition was noted arsenic denied on the Supreme Court’s website.

The territory tribunal bid was 1 of Epic’s constricted wins successful a high-profile antitrust lawsuit complete iOS App Store in-app acquisition fees. A judge wished that Apple had violated California’s Unfair Competition Law by preventing developers from utilizing links to nonstop users to costs methods extracurricular the App Store.

Read Article >

On Monday, Apple was granted a mobility putting a clasp connected the appeals tribunal ruling that would push the institution to undo its “anti-steering” rules and fto extracurricular developers nexus to third-party costs mechanisms. The instruction is stayed for 90 days truthful Apple tin record its petition that the Supreme Court return up the case.

Apple’s anti-steering rules limit really developers tin nonstop users to subscription aliases in-app acquisition payments extracurricular Apple’s App Store ecosystem, wherever it takes a trim of revenue. A territory tribunal found that Apple had not mostly violated antitrust rule pinch its “walled garden” attack to iOS, but it ordered it to driblet rules against letting developers include “calls to action” for extracurricular costs methods.

Read Article >

An appeals tribunal has upheld the position quo successful Epic’s antitrust suit against Apple, affirming a determination that was mostly a triumph for Apple. In a ruling delivered connected Monday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recovered that Apple’s closed App Store and information restrictions didn’t break antitrust rule but that Apple couldn’t support anti-steering rules that forestall users from learning astir alternate costs options.

Apple spokesperson Marni Goldberg provided The Verge pinch the pursuing statement:

Read Article >

Epic Games whitethorn person largely mislaid its awesome suit against Apple, but it’s not going retired without a conflict — and it has immoderate awesome support successful its corner. Soon aft the Epic Games v. Apple ruling was issued, Epic appealed, and connected January 27th, a ample number of organizations revenge amicus briefs successful support of Epic’s battle, including a conjugation of 35 authorities attorneys general, Microsoft, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

During the fight, Epic was trying to make the lawsuit that Apple has a monopoly complete iOS apps, and was asking for changes that would efficaciously unit Apple to return a smaller percent of each the transactions that spell done that store. If Epic were successful successful pushing Apple to judge alternate costs processors, for instance, it could dramatically alteration really Apple, the astir profitable institution successful the world, operates its highly lucrative App Store. In the original case, the judge ultimately ruled successful favour of Apple successful 9 of 10 counts Epic brought against it, but some Epic and Apple appealed the parts that they lost.

Read Article >

Epic Games has revenge its opening brief to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, seeking to overturn the erstwhile ruling that Apple’s power complete the iOS App Store does not suffice arsenic a monopoly. The institution first gave announcement of it entreaty in September, but Thursday’s filing is the first clip it has laid retired its statement astatine length.

“Epic proved astatine proceedings that Apple retrains trade...by contractually requiring developers to exclusively usage Apple’s App Store to administer apps and Apple’s IAP for payments for integer contented wrong apps,” the filing reads. “If not overturned, [the territory court] determination would upend established principles of antitrust rule and...undermine sound antitrust policy.”

Read Article >

An appeals tribunal has paused 1 of the astir consequential parts of the Epic v. Apple ruling, placing a stay connected the enforcement of the injunction issued by the little court. As a consequence of the stay, Apple tin support its IAP strategy arsenic the sole root of in-app payments connected iOS, contempt the territory court’s earlier ruling that the exclusive statement is illegal.

The stay, issued Wednesday afternoon, does not reverse the earlier ruling but puts enforcement connected clasp until the appeals tribunal tin afloat perceive the case, a process that will apt return months.

Read Article >