Aluminium: Why Google’s Android for PC launch may be messy and controversial

Feb 03, 2026 08:00 PM - 3 months ago 97154

“Finally.” That was my first guidance erstwhile I heard Google would harvester Android and ChromeOS into a azygous operating system. Android has agelong struggled connected tablets, and ChromeOS ever felt for illustration excessively overmuch of a stripped-down replacement to tempt maine distant from Windows and Mac. So past week, it was breathtaking to spot a leaked first glimpse astatine Google’s Aluminium OS, and perceive it whitethorn already beryllium slated for an Intel Panther Lake laptop dubbed “Ruby” and a “Sapphire” high-end tablet.

But the early whitethorn not beryllium coming arsenic accelerated arsenic you’d think, and it mightiness beryllium messy erstwhile it gets here. According to antecedently unreported tribunal documents successful the Google hunt antitrust case, Aluminium won’t spot a afloat merchandise until 2028.

Though Google’s caput of Android, Sameer Samat, said past September that the operation of Android and Chrome is “something we’re ace excited astir for adjacent year” — meaning 2026 — the documents propose Aluminium won’t beryllium fresh to alteration the laptop world rather that soon.

 “Google plans to motorboat Project Aluminium successful 2026; correct?” A: “We dream so. We’re moving difficult connected it.”

Image: US v. Google (2020)

In a transcript obtained by The Verge from August 2025, Samat said that Google simply hopes to motorboat Aluminium successful 2026 — “We’re moving difficult connected it,” he said — and Google’s ain lawyers look little sure. In documents Google revenge pinch the court, the caller operating system’s “fastest path” to marketplace involves offering it to “commercial trusted testers” successful precocious 2026 earlier a afloat merchandise successful 2028. And while Chromebooks presently predominate successful schools, the archive suggests that “enterprise and acquisition sectors” successful peculiar will get Aluminium successful 2028, not 2026.

“Even erstwhile the caller OS that runs Chromebooks becomes available, it will not beryllium compatible pinch each existing Chromebook hardware, requiring Google to support existing ChromeOS astatine slightest done 2033 to meet its ‘10 twelvemonth support commitment’ to existing users,” Google’s lawyers added.

We already cognize ChromeOS won’t vanish from laptops correct away. Google’s caput of ChromeOS, John Maletis, confirmed arsenic overmuch to Chrome Unboxed earlier this month, adding that Google will grant its committedness to springiness ChromeOS devices 10 years of automatic updates. But that intends those devices whitethorn get those updates instead of an upgrade to Aluminium. Maletis told Chrome Unboxed:

In position of devices being capable to migrate complete to the caller stack, not each devices will beryllium capable to conscionable because location are method specifications…But a batch of the newer devices, we will beryllium moving connected an expertise for customers to migrate over.

And here’s thing that wasn’t antecedently reported: Google plans to termination disconnected ChromeOS arsenic soon arsenic it tin while gathering its 10-year support responsibility for devices that won’t get Aluminium. The “timeline to shape retired ChromeOS is 2034,” tribunal documents reveal, adding that Google can’t do it immoderate earlier because “jurisdictions person various rules for really agelong a instrumentality must beryllium supported.”

Why did Google lawyers admit each these things successful court? At the time, those attorneys were trying to usage these facts to reason that the US should not and cannot unit Google to waste disconnected Chrome aft abusing its monopoly powerfulness complete search. You tin moreover spot Google’s lawyer starring the judge successful that guidance successful 1 of my screenshots above: “So would divesting Chrome make it much difficult to support the ChromeOS package connected the older computers?”

Last September, in a controversial and wide reported decision, Judge Amit Mehta allowed Google to support Chrome. What wasn’t truthful wide reported: Judge Mehta besides agreed that he won’t prohibition Google from making self-preferencing deals pinch carriers and manufacturers to prioritize Google apps connected their Aluminium OS devices.

From the last judgement successful US v. Google. The US v. Google remedies apparently don’t use to Aluminium devices, moreover though Aluminium is mostly Android.

While Mehta’s last judgment bans deals that explicitly opportunity things for illustration “Motorola can’t put Google apps connected their Android phones unless the phones default to Google Search” aliases “Apple can’t group their default AI app to ChatGPT if they want a stock of Google hunt gross connected the iPhone,” Mehta has exempted ChromeOS and Aluminium from that ban. According to the last judgment, devices “on which the ChromeOS operating strategy aliases a successor to the ChromeOS operating strategy is installed” simply don’t count there.

In a December 2025 opinion, the judge explained successful portion that’s because “Chrome is simply a basal constituent of a ChromeOS device.” Perhaps that’s fair, and possibly Chrome will beryllium basal for Aluminium arsenic well. But possibly it will only beryllium basal because Google designs it that way, giving the Chrome browser and Google apps typical privileges that could perchance beryllium delegated to different browsers and companies arsenic well.

Chrome and first-party Google apps are first-class citizens successful Aluminium, while personification apps are not. That could beryllium important for a bully personification experience; it could beryllium intentional lock-in; it could beryllium neither aliases both.

If Aluminium turns retired to beryllium mostly Android for PCs, a type that conscionable truthful happens to fastener users into Google’s browser and Google’s app shop and APIs, it mightiness alert successful the look of the world’s attempts to curb Google’s monopoly power.

The tipster who pointed america to these documents wonders if, perhaps, Google whitethorn moreover beryllium trying to shield Aluminium from repercussions successful Epic Games v. Google, excessively — the lawsuit that whitethorn ace unfastened the Google Play shop to competition.

While Judge James Donato’s original imperishable injunction successful Epic v. Google applies to Google’s dealings astir the Play Store successful general, presumably moreover if it’s installed connected laptops, desktops, aliases immoderate different benignant of Android-based device, Google and Epic’s projected settlement tweaks the injunction to only use to smartphones and tablets that specifically tally “the Android operating system.” That could exclude Aluminium arsenic good arsenic laptops and desktops successful general, if approved.

How would the tribunal grip it if Google continued monopolistic behaviour not connected phones, but connected Android-based Aluminium laptops?

Google declined our petition to fact-check the Project Aluminium timeline and different statements and documents from the court.

Follow topics and authors from this communicative to spot much for illustration this successful your personalized homepage provender and to person email updates.

More